Resend Patch:
--- linux-2.6.15.1/net/ipv4/ip_options.c.orig 2006-01-27
09:14:33.463612696 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.15.1/net/ipv4/ip_options.c 2006-01-27 09:12:21.857619848
+0900
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
void ip_options_fragment(struct sk_buff * skb)
{
- unsigned char * optptr = skb->nh.raw;
+ unsigned char * optptr = skb->nh.raw + sizeof(struct iphdr);
struct ip_options * opt = &(IPCB(skb)->opt);
int l = opt->optlen;
int optlen;
>
>
> From: "Wei Yongjun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:35:02 -0800
>
> > [1]Summary of the problem:
> > ip_options_fragment() has no effect on fragmentation
> >
> > [2]Full description of the problem:
> > When I send IPv4 packet(contain Record Route Option) which need to be
> > fragmented to the router, the router can not fragment it correctly.
> > After fragmented by router, the second fragmentation still contain Record
> > Route Option. Refer to RFC791, Record Route Option must Not be copied on
> > fragmentation, goes in first fragment only.
> > ip_options_fragment() is the implemental function, but there are some BUGs
> > in it:
>
> I cannot apply any of your patches because they contain
> white space and tabbing corruption created by your email
> client.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
