Re: [PATCH] net: mv88e6xxx: Fix ingress rate removal for mv6131 chips

2016-08-23 Thread David Miller
From: Jamie Lentin Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:47:08 +0100 > The PORT_RATE_CONTROL register works differently on 88e6095/6095f/6131 > in comparison to 6123/61/65, and 0x0 disables. The distinction was lost > Linux 4.1 --> 4.2 > > Signed-off-by: Jamie Lentin Applied.

Re: [PATCH] net: mv88e6xxx: Fix ingress rate removal for mv6131 chips

2016-08-22 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:47:08PM +0100, Jamie Lentin wrote: > The PORT_RATE_CONTROL register works differently on 88e6095/6095f/6131 > in comparison to 6123/61/65, and 0x0 disables. The distinction was lost > Linux 4.1 --> 4.2 > > Signed-off-by: Jamie Lentin Hi Jamie Thanks for the patch. Re

[PATCH] net: mv88e6xxx: Fix ingress rate removal for mv6131 chips

2016-08-22 Thread Jamie Lentin
The PORT_RATE_CONTROL register works differently on 88e6095/6095f/6131 in comparison to 6123/61/65, and 0x0 disables. The distinction was lost Linux 4.1 --> 4.2 Signed-off-by: Jamie Lentin --- Tested on a Netgear WNR854T With a mv88e6131 switch chip, on top of Andrew Lunn's 6131 tagging work: h