The PORT_RATE_CONTROL register works differently on 88e6095/6095f/6131 in comparison to 6123/61/65, and 0x0 disables. The distinction was lost Linux 4.1 --> 4.2
Signed-off-by: Jamie Lentin <j...@lentin.co.uk> --- Tested on a Netgear WNR854T With a mv88e6131 switch chip, on top of Andrew Lunn's 6131 tagging work: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg124142.html Also available at https://github.com/lentinj/linux 6131-ingress-rate-v1 --- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c index 82d4516..22d02dd 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c @@ -2646,15 +2646,19 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup_port(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port) return ret; } + /* Rate Control: disable ingress rate limiting. */ if (mv88e6xxx_6352_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6351_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6165_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6097_family(chip) || - mv88e6xxx_6185_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6095_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6320_family(chip)) { - /* Rate Control: disable ingress rate limiting. */ ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(chip, REG_PORT(port), PORT_RATE_CONTROL, 0x0001); if (ret) return ret; + } else if (mv88e6xxx_6185_family(chip) || mv88e6xxx_6095_family(chip)) { + ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(chip, REG_PORT(port), + PORT_RATE_CONTROL, 0x0000); + if (ret) + return ret; } /* Port Control 1: disable trunking, disable sending -- 2.8.1
