Re: [PATCH] net: fix IPv6 prefix route residue

2019-02-10 Thread Zhiqiang Liu
> On 2/3/19 9:04 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Zhiqiang Liu >> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 14:10:31 +0800 >> >>> @@ -1165,7 +1165,8 @@ enum cleanup_prefix_rt_t { >>> list_for_each_entry(ifa, &idev->addr_list, if_list) { >>> if (ifa == ifp) >>> continue; >>> -

Re: [PATCH] net: fix IPv6 prefix route residue

2019-02-04 Thread David Ahern
On 2/3/19 9:04 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Zhiqiang Liu > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 14:10:31 +0800 > >> @@ -1165,7 +1165,8 @@ enum cleanup_prefix_rt_t { >> list_for_each_entry(ifa, &idev->addr_list, if_list) { >> if (ifa == ifp) >> continue; >> -

Re: [PATCH] net: fix IPv6 prefix route residue

2019-02-03 Thread David Miller
From: Zhiqiang Liu Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 14:10:31 +0800 > @@ -1165,7 +1165,8 @@ enum cleanup_prefix_rt_t { > list_for_each_entry(ifa, &idev->addr_list, if_list) { > if (ifa == ifp) > continue; > - if (!ipv6_prefix_equal(&ifa->addr, &ifp->addr,

[PATCH] net: fix IPv6 prefix route residue

2019-02-02 Thread Zhiqiang Liu
From: Zhiqiang Liu Follow those steps: # ip addr add 2001:123::1/32 dev eth0 # ip addr add 2001:123:456::2/64 dev eth0 # ip addr del 2001:123::1/32 dev eth0 # ip addr del 2001:123:456::2/64 dev eth0 and then prefix route of 2001:123::1/32 will still exist. This is because ipv6_prefix_equal i