Re: [RFC, RFT] Re: [PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-18 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 19:36, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Tuesday 18 July 2006 18:57, Jiri Benc wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:54:33 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > This patch makes sleeping in the hw->config callback possible > > > by removing the only atomic caller. The atomic caller was >

Re: [RFC, RFT] Re: [PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-18 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 18:57, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:54:33 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > This patch makes sleeping in the hw->config callback possible > > by removing the only atomic caller. The atomic caller was > > a timer and is replaced by a workqueue. > > This is a modi

[RFC, RFT] Re: [PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-18 Thread Jiri Benc
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:54:33 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > This patch makes sleeping in the hw->config callback possible > by removing the only atomic caller. The atomic caller was > a timer and is replaced by a workqueue. This is a modified version of the patch that doesn't use cancel_rearming_d

Re: [PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-12 Thread Michael Buesch
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 18:53, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:54:33 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > Please apply this to wireless-dev. > > Note that this is the second try to submit this patch. > > The first try contained a little bug. I'm sorry for that. > > If you already applied th

Re: [PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-12 Thread Jiri Benc
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:54:33 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > Please apply this to wireless-dev. > Note that this is the second try to submit this patch. > The first try contained a little bug. I'm sorry for that. > If you already applied the first one, I can provide an incremental patch. > > Note2

Re: [PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-11 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 11:31, you wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:11:27 +0200 > Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But I think the following is also broken in the old code: > > A wq is not pending anymore, but just executing (before it reschedules > > itself). > > I think that would

Re: [PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:11:27 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But I think the following is also broken in the old code: > A wq is not pending anymore, but just executing (before it reschedules > itself). > I think that would also loop forever. I don't think that's what we want. >

Re: [PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-11 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 06:25, you wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:54:33 +0200 > Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please apply this to wireless-dev. > > Note that this is the second try to submit this patch. > > The first try contained a little bug. I'm sorry for that. > > If you al

Re: [PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:54:33 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please apply this to wireless-dev. > Note that this is the second try to submit this patch. > The first try contained a little bug. I'm sorry for that. > If you already applied the first one, I can provide an incrementa

[PATCH] d80211: make sleeping in hw->config possible #2

2006-07-10 Thread Michael Buesch
Hi John, Please apply this to wireless-dev. Note that this is the second try to submit this patch. The first try contained a little bug. I'm sorry for that. If you already applied the first one, I can provide an incremental patch. Note2 that this patch depends on the [PATCH] cancel_rearming_delay