On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:11:27 +0200
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> But I think the following is also broken in the old code:
> A wq is not pending anymore, but just executing (before it reschedules 
> itself).
> I think that would also loop forever. I don't think that's what we want.
> Because we can't really keep track of _this_.

The present implementation assumes that the handler will re-arm itself.

I agree that extending that makes sense.  But beware that it's easy to
leave subtle holes in this logic.  Needs careful thought to get right.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to