On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:05:28 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hmm, is this required? Will sysfs_remove_link panic on non-existent
> nodes?
No, it won't.
> If yes or if it's considered better style,
I consider it a better style as it's more tolerant to possible changes
in sysfs_remove_link.
> are you
Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:33:34 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> This gets rid of annoying
>>
>> wlan0: cannot create symlink to default key
>>
>> in my syslog with latest rt2x00. The patch takes care that in case of
>> (key/old_key == NULL && set_tx_key) the existing default key symlink
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:33:34 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> This gets rid of annoying
>
> wlan0: cannot create symlink to default key
>
> in my syslog with latest rt2x00. The patch takes care that in case of
> (key/old_key == NULL && set_tx_key) the existing default key symlink is
> removed correctly
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> This gets rid of annoying
>
> wlan0: cannot create symlink to default key
>
> in my syslog with latest rt2x00. The patch takes care that in case of
> (key/old_key == NULL && set_tx_key) the existing default key symlink is
> removed correctly. Moreover, it tests for key!=NULL b
This gets rid of annoying
wlan0: cannot create symlink to default key
in my syslog with latest rt2x00. The patch takes care that in case of
(key/old_key == NULL && set_tx_key) the existing default key symlink is
removed correctly. Moreover, it tests for key!=NULL before trying to register
a new d
