On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:05:28 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hmm, is this required? Will sysfs_remove_link panic on non-existent > nodes?
No, it won't. > If yes or if it's considered better style, I consider it a better style as it's more tolerant to possible changes in sysfs_remove_link. > are you OK with > catching NULL in ieee80211_key_sysfs_remove_default and refactoring the > existing tests along this way? Yes. Thanks, Jiri -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
