Re: [PATCH] WE-20 for kernel 2.6.16

2006-02-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:15:54 -0800 Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:06:29 +0100, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Would you agree with waiting until the wireless summit at osdl is over? > > My experience with Kernel Summit was that things "decided"

Re: [PATCH] WE-20 for kernel 2.6.16

2006-02-27 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:06:29 +0100, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you agree with waiting until the wireless summit at osdl is over? My experience with Kernel Summit was that things "decided" at a summit lose their significance within a month as new developments happen and idea

Re: [PATCH] WE-20 for kernel 2.6.16

2006-02-27 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 08:06:29PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Monday 27 February 2006 18:34, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:48:39PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 17:09 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > > > > I strongly ACK the use of rtnetlin

Re: [PATCH] WE-20 for kernel 2.6.16

2006-02-27 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 27 February 2006 18:34, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:48:39PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 17:09 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > > I strongly ACK the use of rtnetlink, but I leave it to John Linville > > > (wireless maintainer) to do a fu

Re: [PATCH] WE-20 for kernel 2.6.16

2006-02-27 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:48:39PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 17:09 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > I strongly ACK the use of rtnetlink, but I leave it to John Linville > > (wireless maintainer) to do a full review, and merge... > > The question is just -- do we really w

Re: [PATCH] WE-20 for kernel 2.6.16

2006-02-25 Thread Johannes Berg
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 17:09 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I strongly ACK the use of rtnetlink, but I leave it to John Linville > (wireless maintainer) to do a full review, and merge... The question is just -- do we really want another interface that is going to be deprecated in the long run? Sinc

Re: [PATCH] WE-20 for kernel 2.6.16

2006-02-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jean Tourrilhes wrote: Hi Jeff, This is version 20 of the Wireless Extensions. This is the completion of the RtNetlink work I started early 2004, it enables the full Wireless Extension API over RtNetlink. The patch has been fully tested with 2.6.16-rc2 and 2.6.16-rc3 and

[PATCH] WE-20 for kernel 2.6.16

2006-02-22 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
Hi Jeff, This is version 20 of the Wireless Extensions. This is the completion of the RtNetlink work I started early 2004, it enables the full Wireless Extension API over RtNetlink. The patch has been fully tested with 2.6.16-rc2 and 2.6.16-rc3 and various wireless drivers,