From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:59:06 +0900
> I see. The following patch is OK?
This breaks existing 32-bit programs which really want a 32-bit value
there.
Please sit and think about this problem for some time before proposing
more patches.
We have a whole c
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:59:06 +0900
> From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:48:02 -0800 (PST)
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:41:41 +0900
>
>
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:41:41 +0900
> From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland
> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:36:06 -0800 (PST)
>
&g
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:36:06 -0800 (PST)
> > tpacket_hdr structure includes 'unsigned long' though kernel and
> > userlan
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:24:49 +0900
> tpacket_hdr structure includes 'unsigned long' though kernel and
> userland shares it in the mmapped ring buffer.
>
> Seems it would be better to fix all data structures in the header file
> than fixing only tpacket
tpacket_hdr structure includes 'unsigned long' though kernel and
userland shares it in the mmapped ring buffer.
Seems it would be better to fix all data structures in the header file
than fixing only tpacket_hdr structure.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Chr
