On Thursday 02 August 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 August 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > > The Sonics Silicon Backplane is a mini-bus used on
> > > > various Broadcom chips and
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Thursday 02 August 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > The Sonics Silicon Backplane is a mini-bus used on
> > > various Broadcom chips and embedded devices.
> > > Devices using the SSB include b44, bcm43
On Thursday 02 August 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > The Sonics Silicon Backplane is a mini-bus used on
> > various Broadcom chips and embedded devices.
> > Devices using the SSB include b44, bcm43xx and various
> > Broadcom based wireless routers.
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> The Sonics Silicon Backplane is a mini-bus used on
> various Broadcom chips and embedded devices.
> Devices using the SSB include b44, bcm43xx and various
> Broadcom based wireless routers.
> A b44 and bcm43xx port and a SSB based OHCI driver is availabl
On Friday 27 July 2007 16:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:43:59 +0200
> Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Sure, but why is the locking interruptible rather than plain old
> > > mutex_lock()?
> >
> > Hm, well. We hold this mutex for several seconds, as writing tak
On Friday 27 July 2007 22:12:49 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:43:59 +0200
> Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Sure, but why is the locking interruptible rather than plain old
> > > mutex_lock()?
> >
> > Hm, well. We hold this mutex for several seconds, as writing t
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:43:59 +0200
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure, but why is the locking interruptible rather than plain old
> > mutex_lock()?
>
> Hm, well. We hold this mutex for several seconds, as writing takes
> this long. So I simply thought it was worth allowing the wai
On Friday 27 July 2007 21:38:53 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > +static ssize_t ssb_pci_attr_sprom_show(struct device *pcidev,
> > > > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > > + char *buf)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pci_d
On Friday 27 July 2007 21:21:20 John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 06:57:20PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > The Sonics Silicon Backplane is a mini-bus used on
> > various Broadcom chips and embedded devices.
> > Devices using the SSB include b44, bcm43xx and various
> > Broadcom b
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:30:48 +0200
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
> > #4156: FILE: drivers/ssb/ssb_private.h:119:
> > +extern struct ssb_bus * ssb_pci_dev_to_bus(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >
> > are worth addressing.
>
> Well, I intentionally
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 06:57:20PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> The Sonics Silicon Backplane is a mini-bus used on
> various Broadcom chips and embedded devices.
> Devices using the SSB include b44, bcm43xx and various
> Broadcom based wireless routers.
> A b44 and bcm43xx port and a SSB based OH
On Friday 27 July 2007 21:03:18 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:57:20 +0200
> Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The Sonics Silicon Backplane is a mini-bus used on
> > various Broadcom chips and embedded devices.
> > Devices using the SSB include b44, bcm43xx and various
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:57:20 +0200
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Sonics Silicon Backplane is a mini-bus used on
> various Broadcom chips and embedded devices.
> Devices using the SSB include b44, bcm43xx and various
> Broadcom based wireless routers.
> A b44 and bcm43xx port and
13 matches
Mail list logo
