On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:43:59 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure, but why is the locking interruptible rather than plain old > > mutex_lock()? > > Hm, well. We hold this mutex for several seconds, as writing takes > this long. So I simply thought it was worth allowing the waiter > to interrupt here. If you say that's not an issue, I'll be happy > to use mutex_lock() and reduce code complexity in this area. So.. is that what the _interruptible() is for? To allow an impatient user to ^c a read? If so, that sounds reasonable. It's worth a comment explaining these decisions to future readers, because it is hard to work out this sort of thinking just from the bare C code. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
