David Miller wrote:
> From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:38:16 +0300
>
>> Changelog:
>>
>> Use the added dev_alloc_name() call to create tunnel device name,
>> rather than iterate in a hand-made loop with an artificial limit.
>>
>> Thanks Patrick for noticing thi
From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:38:16 +0300
> Changelog:
>
> Use the added dev_alloc_name() call to create tunnel device name,
> rather than iterate in a hand-made loop with an artificial limit.
>
> Thanks Patrick for noticing this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel E
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
It would be nicer to replace the entire hand-made name
allocation to remove the 100 device limit.
Actually, I thought the same, but fixing % in names looks like a
BUG-fix for 2.6.25, while removing t
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nicer to replace the entire hand-made name
>>> allocation to remove the 100 device limit.
>>>
>> Actually, I thought the same, but fixing % in names looks like a
>> BUG-fix for 2.6.25, while removing the h
