Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:

It would be nicer to replace the entire hand-made name
allocation to remove the 100 device limit.

Actually, I thought the same, but fixing % in names looks like a BUG-fix for 2.6.25, while removing the hand-made name allocation looks like an enhancement for 2.6.26. No?

Well, its so closely related that I guess it would still look
like a bugfix :) But changing this in 2.6.26 is also fine of
course, your patch just reminded me since I wanted to change
this for a long time and repeatedly forgot about it again.

Ok, point taken ;) Here's the 2nd patch that does so. If David decides it can go to 2.6.25, that would be good, otherwise this patch will fit the 2.6.26 as well.

Changelog:

Use the added dev_alloc_name() call to create tunnel device name,
rather than iterate in a hand-made loop with an artificial limit.

Thanks Patrick for noticing this.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Looks good to me, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to