Hello Daniel, Jon
Thank you very much for review.
>That is a bit of a problem, since Apache v2 is not compatible with GPLv2.
>If the license of the document cannot be changed, I don't think we can
>accept it into the kernel tree.
Thank you for sharing information, Jon. I will check the rst file
On 09/26/2018 09:44 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:11:42 +0900
> Chang-an Song wrote:
>
>>> - The original document has a copyright assertion but no associated
>>>license. Do we know what the license is? I assume it's something
>>>that is free and GPL-compatible, b
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:11:42 +0900
Chang-an Song wrote:
> > - The original document has a copyright assertion but no associated
> >license. Do we know what the license is? I assume it's something
> >that is free and GPL-compatible, but that would be good to know for
> >sure.
>
>
Hello,
Thank you very much to Tejun and Jon for the review first.
I have summarized the my action items as below,
> I think this would still be helpful and a step in the right direction;
> however, I think it'd be helpful to explicitly note, in korean, that
> the translation is still work-in-prog
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:22:38 +0900
Changan Song wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Changan Song
> ---
> Documentation/translations/ko_KR/bpf-xdp.txt | 3511 ++
> 1 file changed, 3511 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/ko_KR/bpf-xdp.txt
I can't judge the quality
