On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:33:19PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> > > > > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is
> > > > > > sufficient. I don't remember it ever been really discussed for
>
> > > > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > > > >
> > > > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is
> > > > > sufficient. I don't remember it ever been really discussed for
> > > > > DSA. It was a Melanox discussion about limiting pause for the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:19:19PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> > > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > > >
> > > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I
> > > > don't remember it ever been really discussed for DSA. It was a
> >
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:19:19PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> > > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > > >
> > > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I
> > > > don't remember it ever been really discussed for DSA. It was a
> >
> > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > >
> > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I
> > > don't remember it ever been really discussed for DSA. It was a
> > > Melanox discussion about limiting pause for the CPU. So I think it
>
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:12:14AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > >
> > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I
> > > don't remember it ever been really discussed for DSA
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:19:50PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:12:14AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> >
> > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is
> > Hi,
> >
> > Armada has options for 1G/10G ports without PHY's(for example
> community board Macchiato single shot).
> > This port doesn't have PHY's and cannot negotiate Flow Control support,
> but we can for example connect two ports without PHY's and manually(by
> ethtool) configure FC.
>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:12:14AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
>
> DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I don't
> remember it ever been really discussed for DSA. It was a Melanox
>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:51:46AM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Armada has options for 1G/10G ports without PHY's(for example
> > community board Macchiato single shot).
> > > This port doesn't have PHY's and cannot negotiate Flow Control support,
> > but we can for example
10 matches
Mail list logo
