RE:(2) (2) (2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-08 Thread 배석진
>On 11/08/2018 04:42 PM, 배석진 wrote: >> Thanks for testing. >>> >>> This is not a pristine net-next tree, this dump seems unrelated to the  >>>patch ? >>  >>  >> yes, looks like that. >> but only when using your patch, panic came. even right after packet  >>recieving.. >> without that, there's no pr

Re: (2) (2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-08 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 11/08/2018 04:42 PM, 배석진 wrote: >> Thanks for testing. >> >> This is not a pristine net-next tree, this dump seems unrelated to the patch >> ? > > > yes, looks like that. > but only when using your patch, panic came. even right after packet > recieving.. > without that, there's no problem

RE:(2) (2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-08 Thread 배석진
>Thanks for testing. > >This is not a pristine net-next tree, this dump seems unrelated to the patch ? yes, looks like that. but only when using your patch, panic came. even right after packet recieving.. without that, there's no problem except defrag issue. it's odd.. :p I couldn't more debuggin

Re: (2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-08 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 11/07/2018 11:58 PM, 배석진 wrote: >> - Original Message - >> Sender : Eric Dumazet  >> Date : 2018-11-08 15:13 (GMT+9) >> Title : Re: (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting >>   >> On 11/07/2018 08:26 PM, Eric Dumazet w

RE:(2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-07 Thread 배석진
>- Original Message - >Sender : Eric Dumazet  >Date : 2018-11-08 15:13 (GMT+9) >Title : Re: (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting >  >On 11/07/2018 08:26 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>  >>  >> On 11/07/2018 08:10 PM, 배석진 wr

Re: (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-07 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 11/07/2018 08:26 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On 11/07/2018 08:10 PM, 배석진 wrote: >>> - Original Message - >>> Sender : Eric Dumazet  >>> Date : 2018-11-08 12:57 (GMT+9) >>> Title : Re: (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet d

Re: (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-07 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 11/07/2018 08:10 PM, 배석진 wrote: >> - Original Message - >> Sender : Eric Dumazet  >> Date : 2018-11-08 12:57 (GMT+9) >> Title : Re: (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting >>   >> On 11/07/2018 07:24 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:

RE:(2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-07 Thread 배석진
> - Original Message - > Sender : Eric Dumazet  > Date : 2018-11-08 12:57 (GMT+9) > Title : Re: (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting >   > On 11/07/2018 07:24 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > Sure, it is better if RPS is smarter, bu

Re: (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-07 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 11/07/2018 07:24 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Sure, it is better if RPS is smarter, but if there is a bug in IPv6 defrag > unit > we must investigate and root-cause it. BTW, IPv4 defrag seems to have the same issue.

Re: (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-07 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 11/07/2018 06:05 PM, 배석진 wrote: > - Original Message - > Sender : Eric Dumazet > Date : 2018-11-08 10:44 (GMT+9) > Title : Re: [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting > >> On 11/07/2018 05:29 PM, 배석진 wrote: >> >>> If ipv6_defrag hook is not excuted simultaneo

RE:(2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting

2018-11-07 Thread 배석진
- Original Message - Sender : Eric Dumazet Date : 2018-11-08 10:44 (GMT+9) Title : Re: [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting > On 11/07/2018 05:29 PM, 배석진 wrote: > > > If ipv6_defrag hook is not excuted simultaneously, then it's ok. > > ipv6_defrag hook can handl