On 11/08/2018 04:42 PM, 배석진 wrote: >> Thanks for testing. >> >> This is not a pristine net-next tree, this dump seems unrelated to the patch >> ? > > > yes, looks like that. > but only when using your patch, panic came. even right after packet > recieving.. > without that, there's no problem except defrag issue. it's odd.. :p > I couldn't more debugging since have other problems. You might need to backport some fixes (check all changes to lib/rhashtable.c )
- Re: [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting Eric Dumazet
- RE:(2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting 배석진
- Re: (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmenting Eric Dumazet
- Re: (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defragmen... Eric Dumazet
- RE:(2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet defrag... 배석진
- Re: (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on packet d... Eric Dumazet
- Re: (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on pack... Eric Dumazet
- RE:(2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug report on p... 배석진
- Re: (2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug repor... Eric Dumazet
- RE:(2) (2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] Bug re... 배석진
- Re: (2) (2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET] B... Eric Dumazet
- RE:(2) (2) (2) (2) (2) [Kernel][NET... 배석진