t)
> if (!test_bit(__IXGBE_DOWN, &adapter->state))
> ixgbe_irq_enable_queues(adapter, BIT_ULL(q_vector->v_idx));
>
> - return 0;
> + return min(work_done, budget - 1);
> }
>
> /**
Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Srinivas
The same bit of code appe
noise (+0.6%
- +1% bandwidth).
What tests did you see a 2-3% win on?
Do you think its worth modifying add_recvbuf_small() to use
napi_alloc_skb() when called from
Rx NAPI (virtnet_receive)?
Tested-by: Venkatesh Srinivas
Thanks,
-- vs;
align() invocation in
> add_recvbuf_small(), suggested by Venkatesh Srinivas
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index fb0eae4..100e039 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:15:23AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> We know vring num is a power of 2, so use &
> to mask the high bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
The generated code switches from DIV -> masking, source is clearer as well.
Tested-
