On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> wrote: > > This gives small but noticeable rx performance improvement (2-3%) > and will allow exploiting future napi improvement. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> > ---
Worked in my tests, though the performance win was in the noise (+0.6% - +1% bandwidth). What tests did you see a 2-3% win on? Do you think its worth modifying add_recvbuf_small() to use napi_alloc_skb() when called from Rx NAPI (virtnet_receive)? Tested-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkate...@google.com> Thanks, -- vs;
