Re: broken link-local multicast?

2008-02-17 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Feb 15, Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ping6 -c 1 -I eth1 ff02::1 >> connect: Network is unreachable > > Maybe 'netstat -gn' could give clues, because you should be receiving a > response at least from the loopback address. Maybe your loopback > interface ha

broken link-local multicast?

2008-02-14 Thread Marco d';Itri
Link-local multicast appears to be broken on some interfaces of some of my firewalls. I think that this started after I configured quagga's ospf6d (which does not work because of this), but I am not totally sure. Does anybody have any idea about how to debug this? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ping6 -c 1

Re: VLAN subinterfaces, bridges and udev

2006-05-01 Thread Marco d';Itri
On May 01, Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Can I rely on the presence of the $DEVPATH/driver symlink (e.g. > >/sys/class/net/eth0/driver) to check if a network interface is a "real" > >device insteaf of a VLAN or a bridge? > To distinguish I use a VLAN specific IOCTL (GET_VLAN_REALDEV_NAM

VLAN subinterfaces, bridges and udev

2006-04-30 Thread Marco d';Itri
[Please Cc me, I am not subscribed to netdev.] Can I rely on the presence of the $DEVPATH/driver symlink (e.g. /sys/class/net/eth0/driver) to check if a network interface is a "real" device insteaf of a VLAN or a bridge? - Forwarded message from Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [RFC] Backward compatibility and WAN netdev configuration

2006-02-01 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Feb 01, Krzysztof Halasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a) Currently it consists of mid-layer WAN protocols single module (Cisco >HDLC, FR etc.) + low-level hardware HDLC card driver (C101, N2, PCI200SYN >etc.). I'm thinking about splitting the protocol module into separate >modules -