On Feb 15, Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ping6 -c 1 -I eth1 ff02::1
>> connect: Network is unreachable
>
> Maybe 'netstat -gn' could give clues, because you should be receiving a
> response at least from the loopback address. Maybe your loopback
> interface has went down, or ospf6d took it down and back up (at least
> some time ago, kernel's v6 got very confused after that).
The loopback is up. ospf6d /may/ have done something to it, but I do not
know how to check this (and I cannot reboot these servers right now).
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,10000> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> You may also want to check out that your link-local address on the
> interface you're pinging is still OK.
Apparently it is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# netstat -gn | grep eth1
eth1 1 224.0.0.5
eth1 1 224.0.0.1
eth1 1 ff02::6
eth1 1 ff02::5
eth1 2 ff02::1:ff00:0
eth1 1 ff02::2
eth1 1 ff02::1:ff00:89
eth1 1 ff02::1:ffd8:7dd
eth1 1 ff02::1
These (except ff02::1:ffd8:7dd, which is different) are the same
addresses of eth0, which works.
On Feb 15, David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco,
> You called this a "firewall" -- do you get the same thing
> when you have no iptables rules?
Yes, I double checked again and reproduced these results with totally
empty v6 chains.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
