On 7/17/20, 12:53 PM, "David Miller" wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
From:
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 21:10:03 +0300
> To the best o
>>
>> As explained, a busy-poll session exists for a specified timeout
>> value, after which it exits the busy-poll mode and re-enters it later.
>> This leads to many invocations of the napi handler where
>> napi_complete_done() false indicates that interrupts should be
>>
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 9, 2020, at 11:23 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
>> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:05:00 +0
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 10, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:18:40AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From:
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:19:16 +0300
>>
>>> +static inline void set_io_rings_size(struct ena_adapter *adapter,
>>> + int
On 6/7/19, 2:27 PM, "Jakub Kicinski" wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 18:14:16 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 01:04:14 +0000, Bshara, Nafea wrote:
> > On Jun 6, 2019, at 4:43 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > >>> Okay, then you k
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 6, 2019, at 4:43 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> Okay, then you know which one is which. Are there multiple ENAs but
>>> one EFA?
>>
>> Yes, very possible. Very common
>>
>> Typical use case that instances have one ena for control plane, one
>> for internet facing
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 4:08 PM, Jakub Kicinski
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 22:57:21 +0000, Bshara, Nafea wrote:
>>> Having said that, it's entirely unclear to me what the user scenario is
>>> here. You say "which two devices rel
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 3:05 PM, Jakub Kicinski
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 21:40:19 +, Bshara, Nafea wrote:
>> On 6/6/19, 10:16 AM, "Jakub Kicinski" wrote:
>>
>>Hi Samih!
>>
>>Please don't top
On 6/6/19, 10:16 AM, "Jakub Kicinski" wrote:
Hi Samih!
Please don't top post on Linux kernel mailing lists.
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:23:40 +, Jubran, Samih wrote:
> As of today there are no flags exposed by ENA NIC device, however, we
> are planning to use them i
Andrew,
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2019, at 6:52 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Any "SmartNIC" vendor has temptation of uAPI-level hand off to the
>> firmware (including my employer), we all run pretty beefy processors
>> inside "the NIC" after all. The device centric ethtool configuration
>> ca
It is high priority for us right after this major release get merged.
On 10/9/18, 12:31 PM, "Jesper Dangaard Brouer" wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:44:57 +0300 wrote:
> From: Arthur Kiyanovski
>
> This patchset introduces the following:
> 1. A new placement policy
Ship it
On 10/8/18, 5:28 AM, "akiy...@amazon.com" wrote:
From: Arthur Kiyanovski
Arthur Kiyanovski (5):
net: ena: fix indentations in ena_defs for better readability
net: ena: fix warning in rmmod caused by double iounmap
net: ena: fix rare bug when failed restar
12 matches
Mail list logo
