Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:09:25PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
> Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > Perhaps it's useful to file a bug/patch
> > on http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ ? Perhaps -mm testing?
>
> I wanted to push this though our testing labs first which has not
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply!
>
> OK, here's part 1, the MII-less support stuff.
> (preliminary posting, for review only)
>
> Note that these diffs apply to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 without much trouble,
>
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:17:40AM +0100, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2008.01.04 09:45:17 +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > And then it needs these card I/O functions wrapped into two functions which
> > interface with driver- and OS-related MAC variables
> > (struct variables A
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:43:57AM +0100, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2008.01.03 01:42:09 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [ original bug report: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/2/253 ]
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:48:43PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > > The n
nd I haven't tried -rc6
proper on that machine yet either, build takes ages ;).
OK, since I cannot really offer anything other than positive feelings about
this being non-rc6 breakage, should I try -rc6 proper, too?
> Hm, I wonder if this means I can go back to drinking more holiday
> wi
with all the proper accoutrements.
Finally a 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 with working USB WLAN. :)
IOW I can confirm that this was the cause of the USB problem I was having.
Thanks!
Andreas Mohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
bit deeper review after newyears.
Part 2, the spelling corrections.
Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6/drivers/net/e100.c 2008-01-01 18:53:21.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6/drivers/net/e100.c 2008-01-01 18:53:25.0 +0100
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
bit deeper review after newyears.
Thanks for your quick reply!
OK, here's part 1, the MII-less support stuff.
(preliminary posting, for review only)
Note that these diffs apply to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 without much trouble,
thus might want to do -mm testing soon.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr <[EMA
mail written using a reassuringly stable connection over the newly
adapted driver...
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.24-rc6/drivers/net/e100.c.orig2007-12-28 18:05:39.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc6/drivers/net/e100.c 2007-12-29 0
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:22:01AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:17:28PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > And this is the state that my 2.6.24-rc_six_-mm1 tree is in already.
>
> OK.
>
> > So either it didn't help here or it broke
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 09:41:45PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:40:56PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:23:42AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > (commit 2b1e300a9dfc3196ccddf6f1d74b91b7af55e416)
> > >
gs: bus master, stepping, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 64
Memory at e000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
I/O ports at d000 [size=256]
Memory at ed00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
[virtual] Expansion ROM at ec00 [disabled] [size=128K]
atched, obviously.
Oh, and isdnlog *is* indeed running, so this is a first check that
ISDN functionality seems to be up and running...
IOW, thanks!!
Andreas Mohr
--
Want to provide valuable development feedback about your kernel version?
Install http://klive.cpushare.com/ !
-
To unsubscribe from thi
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 03:17:24PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> I thus decided to now try plain 2.6.23-rc8 whether it's "corrupted", too.
OK, after 3 hours of compilation the ONLY datapoint I can give right now is:
1 (one) boot on 2.6.23-rc8-mm2 had the BUG in /var/log/mess
es pending for 2.6.24.
...only if I have a known-working very recent version, which is exactly
the problem now.
Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
day
(with some workarounds hopefully, maybe even disabling ISDN completely)...
The last running kernel (I didn't have newer ones in between), up for some 110
days was 2.6.19-cks2 (IOW, I cannot quite say that
"this is an important regression, it has been broken very recently").
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-x:
.rodata 42c8
.data 0b4c
ls -l:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 114532 2006-08-19 21:06 drivers/net/tg3.ko
Compile- and run-tested with tg3 card on 2.6.18-rc3-mm2.
Any objections?
Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urN linux-2.6.18-rc3-mm2.orig/drivers/net/tg3.c
probe_qdi=1" or similar is set.
>
> another quick hack is to check for vesa lb... eg if pci is present, skip
> this thing entirely :)
Eh? You haven't really heard of those quite popular ISA/VLB/PCI 486 combo
boards, now have you? ;)
(IIRC I had one of those things a long
job and moved)
Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> This patch fixes the following compile error with CONFIG_NI5010=y:
Doh, thanks!
(that should teach me to do non-module runs, too)
Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
ries ;-)
Whichever way this irons out, at this point I'm quite indifferent to what
happens, given that I really don't feel like spending too many endless weekends
with hardware and driver puzzles any more in exchange for rather dubious gains.
There's also a lot of fun in generic Linu
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:31:16PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Friday 03 February 2006 12:58, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > - use "% 8" modulo instead of more complicated "% 5" calculation
>
> Why? There will be HZ=100 and HZ=250 boxes, 8ms doesn't
t for signed integers,
> and gcc uses idiv insn instead.
...which is one of the performance reasons why it may be a good idea
to use unsigned ints wherever signedness isn't required (unsigned int
is said to be faster sometimes, on many platforms).
Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this li
ewhere!?
- tiny cleanup
Andreas Mohr
diff -urN acx-20060202/acx_func.h acx-20060202_stats/acx_func.h
--- acx-20060202/acx_func.h 2006-02-01 10:49:31.0 +0100
+++ acx-20060202_stats/acx_func.h 2006-02-05 06:21:35.0 +0100
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
** but may be run under lock
tching it!
> > Total driver size increase: less than 2kB!
>
> Wonderful
I'm still expecting this to go up to perhaps 6kB increase, though.
Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
more tolerant of newish
compatibility cruft. It's not like we're supporting kernel 2.2.x here still,
our driver is at 2.6.10 at a minimum(!), yet you still want to remove even
those few pieces!
This is simply ridiculous (again, as long as our driver isn't merged, which it
should be soon
ntk() as requested recently
Note that both patches are based on acx-20060116 proper (rediffed from
acx-20060113), smallish conflicts may result; apply acx-20060116_KERN_xxx.diff
after acx-20060116_misc.diff.
Andreas Mohr
diff -urN acx-20060116.orig/acx_struct.h acx-20060116_misc/acx_struct.h
---
know, this one is
> with set to 3.
No, I think that's it, I know what to do.
Thanks for the report,
Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 04:19:07PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Thursday 12 January 2006 12:37, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > [copying netdev for centralized development]
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > some updates to acx-20060111:
>
> I'm afraid I
p
This patch is rediffed from my modified acx-20060109 tar, NOT compile-tested!
Andreas Mohr
diff -urN acx-20060111.orig/acx_config.h acx-20060111/acx_config.h
--- acx-20060111.orig/acx_config.h 2006-01-08 19:51:28.0 +0100
+++ acx-20060111/acx_config.h 2006-01-12 11:21:08.0
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 08:42:24AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 17:11, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch adds support for configopt parsing for ACX100 EEPROM version v5
> > (please report whether ACX100 v5 now works, pr
ubled by our lack of ieee80211 use
any more ;)
That said, of course we should try to get rid of our own, historic (originating
from binary TI driver!) in-driver stack very soon.
I won't do any comments on which stack to use, though, I will do research first
and then work out which one to use
32 matches
Mail list logo
