On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:18:17 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this doc-only change which updates the javadoc
> on several methods of the `java.net.DatagramSocket` class to match its
> current implementation?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336817.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:22:13 GMT, Darragh Clarke wrote:
>> Currently `HttpClient` will timeout if a server doesn't respond to a request
>> which includes `Expect: 100-Continue`
>>
>> Section 10.1.1 of [rfc
>> 9110](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9110#name-expect) states that
>>
>> a
> Can I please get a review of this change which fixes the issue noted in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8335181?
>
> As noted in that issue, the current implementation in the
> `java.net.http.HttpClient` doesn't correctly handle an incoming GOAWAY frame.
> The HTTP3 RFC https://www.rfc-
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:33:29 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> simplify request approver test construct - no need to expect request path
>
> src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/inter
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:19:44 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which fixes the issue noted in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8335181?
>>
>> As noted in that issue, the current implementation in the
>> `java.net.http.HttpClient` doesn't correctly handl
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:13:42 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which fixes the issue noted in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8335181?
>
> As noted in that issue, the current implementation in the
> `java.net.http.HttpClient` doesn't correctly handle an i
This is a fresh version of the PR that I had opened here
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/20442. A `git merge` command ended up
causing unexpected issues with that old PR.
The commits in this PR are the ones which were already reviewed and a new one
which was done to implement Daniel's sugge
> This is a fresh version of the PR that I had opened here
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/20442. A `git merge` command ended up
> causing unexpected issues with that old PR.
>
> The commits in this PR are the ones which were already reviewed and a new one
> which was done to implement Da
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 15:08:24 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> This is a fresh version of the PR that I had opened here
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/20442. A `git merge` command ended up
>> causing unexpected issues with that old PR.
>>
>> The commits in this PR are the ones which were alr
Please find here a fix for [8336655: java/net/httpclient/DigestEchoClient.java
IOException: HTTP/1.1 header parser received no
bytes](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336655).
This fix has been seen failing intermittently on the mainline.
When an HTTP/1.1 is returned to the HTTP/1.1 pool, a
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 15:08:24 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> This is a fresh version of the PR that I had opened here
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/20442. A `git merge` command ended up
>> causing unexpected issues with that old PR.
>>
>> The commits in this PR are the ones which were alr
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:32:19 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This is a fresh version of the PR that I had opened here
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/20442. A `git merge` command ended up
> causing unexpected issues with that old PR.
>
> The commits in this PR are the ones which were already
12 matches
Mail list logo
