Michael,
On 11/06/2019 18:14, Michael McMahon wrote:
...
Updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8216417/webrev.4/
This looks very good.
-Chris.
On 11/06/2019 18:14, Michael McMahon wrote:
Hi Alan
I've made the suggested changes. I need to confirm with Pavel what the
background
was for the Linux kernel check. For now, it is still there in the
test. Maybe, that could
be removed as part of another change later, if that turns out to be
p
Hi Alan
I've made the suggested changes. I need to confirm with Pavel what the
background
was for the Linux kernel check. For now, it is still there in the test.
Maybe, that could
be removed as part of another change later, if that turns out to be
possible.
Updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.
Michael,
> On 11 Jun 2019, at 14:55, Michael McMahon
> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris
>
> DatagramSocket has its own copies of the same fields and it stores
> the values supplied by the caller (rather than the scopified version),
> which are returned by getRemoteSocketAddress() and getInetAddress().
>
A
Hi Chris
DatagramSocket has its own copies of the same fields and it stores
the values supplied by the caller (rather than the scopified version),
which are returned by getRemoteSocketAddress() and getInetAddress().
Michael.
On 11/06/2019, 14:19, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Michael,
On 11 Jun 2019,
Michael,
> On 11 Jun 2019, at 12:11, Michael McMahon
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review Alan.
> I've made the changes suggested by you and Daniel
> and added a test to Scoping.java for checking the connected IP address.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8216417/webrev.3/index.html
Look
On 11/06/2019 12:11, Michael McMahon wrote:
Thanks for the review Alan.
I've made the changes suggested by you and Daniel
and added a test to Scoping.java for checking the connected IP address.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8216417/webrev.3/index.html
One suggestion for the AbstractPlainS
Thanks for the review Alan.
I've made the changes suggested by you and Daniel
and added a test to Scoping.java for checking the connected IP address.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8216417/webrev.3/index.html
- Michael
On 10/06/2019, 16:49, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/06/2019 15:18, Micha
Good point Daniel. Thanks for the review.
- Michael.
On 10/06/2019, 19:48, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Michael,
AbstractPlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:
in `send` maybe the packet should only be recreated if the address
is different.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 10/06/2019 15:18, Michael McMahon wro
Hi Michael,
AbstractPlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:
in `send` maybe the packet should only be recreated if the address
is different.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 10/06/2019 15:18, Michael McMahon wrote:
Hi,
Could I get the following change to net/nio reviewed please?
It is a general cleanup of
On 10/06/2019 15:18, Michael McMahon wrote:
Hi,
Could I get the following change to net/nio reviewed please?
It is a general cleanup of IPv6 scope_id handling which removes
a lot of native code trickery (mostly in Linux) and simplifies the
handling
of scope_ids such that:
a) when binding/con
11 matches
Mail list logo
