On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:31:55 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Hm, much better. Thanks!
>
>> The phrase "descending order" seems more appropriate for numerical values. I
>> think the previous wording was more clear, with a small change: "The array
>> is ordered based on protocol preference, with the
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:42:56 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 619:
>>
>>> 617: *
>>> 618: * @return a non-null, possibly zero-length array of application
>>> protocol
>>> 619: * {@code String}s. The array
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:46:28 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> In the getApplicationProtocols() method in javax.net.ssl.SSLParameters, the
>> return statement says that "The array is ordered based on protocol
>> preference, with protocols[0] being the most preferred.". However, there is
>> no
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:16:43 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update per feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/SSLParameters.java line 619:
>
>> 617: *
>
> In the getApplicationProtocols() method in javax.net.ssl.SSLParameters, the
> return statement says that "The array is ordered based on protocol
> preference, with protocols[0] being the most preferred.". However, there is
> no "protocols" variable in this method.
>
> The update is a minor co
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 07:12:42 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> In the getApplicationProtocols() method in javax.net.ssl.SSLParameters, the
> return statement says that "The array is ordered based on protocol
> preference, with protocols[0] being the most preferred.". However, there is
> no "pro
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 07:12:42 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> In the getApplicationProtocols() method in javax.net.ssl.SSLParameters, the
> return statement says that "The array is ordered based on protocol
> preference, with protocols[0] being the most preferred.". However, there is
> no "pro
