Re: RFR: 8193370 Provide more user friendly defaults for HTTP/2 client settings

2017-12-13 Thread Chris Hegarty
Daniel, Simone, On 13/12/17 01:17, Daniel Fuchs wrote: Hi Simone, On 12/12/2017 21:02, Daniel Fuchs wrote: On 12/12/2017 18:21, Simone Bordet wrote: Our experience is that even in fast network (not localhost) 16 MiB session windows will hit TCP congestion control before stalling HTTP/2 flow c

Re: RFR: 8193370 Provide more user friendly defaults for HTTP/2 client settings

2017-12-12 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Simone, On 12/12/2017 21:02, Daniel Fuchs wrote: On 12/12/2017 18:21, Simone Bordet wrote: Our experience is that even in fast network (not localhost) 16 MiB session windows will hit TCP congestion control before stalling HTTP/2 flow control. I have experimented with 16Mib and 32Mib. Even

Re: RFR: 8193370 Provide more user friendly defaults for HTTP/2 client settings

2017-12-12 Thread Daniel Fuchs
Hi Simone, Long time no talk ;-) Thanks for sharing your experience! On 12/12/2017 18:21, Simone Bordet wrote: Our experience is that even in fast network (not localhost) 16 MiB session windows will hit TCP congestion control before stalling HTTP/2 flow control. I have experimented with 16Mi

Re: RFR: 8193370 Provide more user friendly defaults for HTTP/2 client settings

2017-12-12 Thread Simone Bordet
Hi, On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote: > >> On 12 Dec 2017, at 17:43, Daniel Fuchs wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> please find below a patch for: >> >> 8193370 Provide more user friendly defaults for HTTP/2 client settings >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193370 >> >> webre

Re: RFR: 8193370 Provide more user friendly defaults for HTTP/2 client settings

2017-12-12 Thread Chris Hegarty
> On 12 Dec 2017, at 17:43, Daniel Fuchs wrote: > > Hi, > > please find below a patch for: > > 8193370 Provide more user friendly defaults for HTTP/2 client settings > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193370 > > webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8193370/webrev.01/