On Thu, 5 May 2022 12:55:57 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>>
>> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
>> is treated as the default route address.
>> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; ho
On Tue, 3 May 2022 09:11:41 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Michael Felt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Use @requires jtreg tag rather than check in code
>
> test/jdk/java/net/Inet4Address/P
On Tue, 3 May 2022 11:13:37 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Michael Felt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Use @requires jtreg tag rather than check in code
>
> test/jdk/java/net/Inet4Address/P
ail - not
> substituting
> 0.0.0.0 with 127.0.0.1. However, InetAddress.getByName("") returns 127.0.0.1
> which compares well with other platform's behavior.
Michael Felt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last r
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:58:44 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> This is a test in tier2 though - so I don't expect it will be caught by
>> github actions
>
> re: actions - the default seems to be enable all, so unclear on what I would
> need to do extra to get these workin
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:59:54 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> @aixtools, if you enable GitHub Actions on your forked repo, it should then
>> automatically trigger a GitHub Actions job for your changes in your PR and
>> those results/run will be visible in this PR. The openjdk/jdk repo has been
>> c
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:16:54 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Michael Felt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> missing semi-colon
>
> The changes looks ok to me given that the test can be co
ail - not
> substituting
> 0.0.0.0 with 127.0.0.1. However, InetAddress.getByName("") returns 127.0.0.1
> which compares well with other platform's behavior.
Michael Felt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Use
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:16:54 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Michael Felt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> missing semi-colon
>
> The changes looks ok to me given that the test can be co
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:56:00 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/net/Inet4Address/PingThis.java line 49:
>>
>>> 47: public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
>>> 48: osname = System.getProperty("os.name")
>>> 49: /*
>>
>> Doesn't look like the line abov
ail - not
> substituting
> 0.0.0.0 with 127.0.0.1. However, InetAddress.getByName("") returns 127.0.0.1
> which compares well with other platform's behavior.
Michael Felt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last r
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:25:44 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Michael Felt has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
>> compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request co
ail - not
> substituting
> 0.0.0.0 with 127.0.0.1. However, InetAddress.getByName("") returns 127.0.0.1
> which compares well with other platform's behavior.
Michael Felt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Adjusted
On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 14:11:28 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>>
>> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
>> is treated as the default route address.
>> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; ho
On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 13:50:30 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>>
>> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
>> is treated as the default route address.
>> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; ho
ail - not
> substituting
> 0.0.0.0 with 127.0.0.1. However, InetAddress.getByName("") returns 127.0.0.1
> which compares well with other platform's behavior.
Michael Felt has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
commits have been removed. The incremental v
ail - not
> substituting
> 0.0.0.0 with 127.0.0.1. However, InetAddress.getByName("") returns 127.0.0.1
> which compares well with other platform's behavior.
Michael Felt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revis
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:56:07 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>
> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
> is treated as the default route address.
> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not acc
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:15:06 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> From the description and evaluation of
> [JDK-7163874](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7163874) it seems that
> skipping this test on AIX would be reasonable.
>
> Some operating systems seem to accept 0.0.0.0 as input - and reply
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:56:07 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>
> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
> is treated as the default route address.
> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not acc
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:56:07 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>
> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
> is treated as the default route address.
> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not acc
-Original Message-
From: net-dev On Behalf Of Michael McMahon
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2022 16:14
To: net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8280498: [aix]: jdk/java/net/Inet4Address/PingThis.java
fails
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:46:32 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> If it d
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:37:00 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Or is it possible to change the implementation on AIX so the test passes
>> without change?
>
> If it defeats the purpose, then it needs to be skipped.
>
> * When I was trying to understand the test, it seemed
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:30:01 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/net/Inet4Address/PingThis.java line 62:
>>
>>> 60: else {
>>> 61: addrs.add("0.0.0.0");
>>> 62: }
>>
>> This conflicts with the purpose of the test. Maybe this test needs to be
>>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:26:51 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> > Does the label being removed mean the site knows I now have an _oca_?
>
> Yes. The oca label was removed by the bot. It also did sent the mail to the
> associated ML
> (https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2022-January/01738
Hi, I went to the ticket you opened – and it seems I need to do something
additional – as I cannot login to comment (should I need to).
Thx again for opening the ticket.
From: Thomas Stüfe
Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2022 11:23
To: Alan Bateman
Cc: Michael Felt ; ppc-aix-port-dev
; net
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:56:07 GMT, Michael Felt wrote:
> with IP "0.0.0.0"
>
> - it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
> is treated as the default route address.
> - IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not acc
with IP "0.0.0.0"
- it either does nothing and ping fails, or, in some virtual environments
is treated as the default route address.
- IPv6 support for ::1 is available since 1977; however, ::0 is not accepted
as a vaild psuedo IPv6 address. '::1' must be used instead.
ping: bind: The socket name
Thank you Thomas!
From: Thomas Stüfe
Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2022 11:23
To: Alan Bateman
Cc: Michael Felt ; ppc-aix-port-dev
; net-dev
Subject: Re: Pull Request: 7013: AIX: InetAddress.getByName(addr) does not work
as expected
Redirecting to net-dev
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 11
29 matches
Mail list logo
