On 08/05/2020 09:07, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review this OpenJDK 8u (and 7u) specific patch which fixes a
> build failure with
> upcoming glibc 2.32 release. This isn't an issue in later JDKs because
> headers got cleaned
> up by JDK-8167481. Bringing this back into OpenJDK 8u to
- Original Message -
> On 21/04/2015 16:04, Michael McMahon wrote:
> > :
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8078276/webrev.1/
> Before you push this, shouldn't the test have copyright Red Hat? There's
> an example in the same directory.
>
> -Alan
>
Yes, I was thinking the sam
- Original Message -
> Adding in net-dev.
>
> On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 14:02 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could I please get a review and a sponsor for the following patch?
> >
> > The issue is that JDK's internal /etc/resolv.conf nameserver parsing
> > does not properly ac
- Original Message -
> Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
> discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
> proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want to simplify this if
> possible
> (
- Original Message -
> [cc'ing net-dev mailing list]
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue.
>
> This looks like 7089443 [1], fixed in jdk8 via 7112670 [2]. Looks
> like
> icetea needs to sync up, or maybe they are based against the jdk7
> repo.
The report is from OpenJDK6:
/usr/lib/jvm/ja
