On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 18:50:50 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please find here a changeset that fixes the infrequent (but annoying) test
>> failures
>> caused by unexpected ConnectionException "Connection timed out: no further
>> information"
>> which have been observed to occur on some p
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:23:19 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8256459: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests.java and
>> java/net/httpclient/LineBodyHandlerTest.java fail infrequently w
> Hi,
>
> Please find here a changeset that fixes the infrequent (but annoying) test
> failures
> caused by unexpected ConnectionException "Connection timed out: no further
> information"
> which have been observed to occur on some platforms.
>
> Tests are updated to allow the test server to h
I'm wondering what the process is for the pull request I submitted, I guess
I need a reviewer or a sponsor?
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 14:08, Jamie Le Tual wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> I received an email this morning saying my OCA had been processed, but
> that it would perhaps take a couple of hours before
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:23:19 GMT, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please find here a changeset that fixes the infrequent (but annoying) test
>> failures
>> caused by unexpected ConnectionException "Connection timed out: no further
>> information"
>> which have been observed to occur on some
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:37:42 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find here a changeset that fixes the infrequent (but annoying) test
> failures
> caused by unexpected ConnectionException "Connection timed out: no further
> information"
> which have been observed to occur on some platform
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:37:42 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find here a changeset that fixes the infrequent (but annoying) test
> failures
> caused by unexpected ConnectionException "Connection timed out: no further
> information"
> which have been observed to occur on some platform
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:32:54 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for JDK-8254996: 'make
> jdk.net.UnixDomainPrincipal a record class'?
>
> `jdk.net.UnixDomainPrincipal` is a simple immutable data class that requires
> boilerplate methods for access. How
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for JDK-8254996: 'make
> jdk.net.UnixDomainPrincipal a record class'?
>
> `jdk.net.UnixDomainPrincipal` is a simple immutable data class that requires
> boilerplate methods for access. However, these methods and fields are
> susceptible to trivial
Hi,
Please find here a changeset that fixes the infrequent (but annoying) test
failures
caused by unexpected ConnectionException "Connection timed out: no further
information"
which have been observed to occur on some platforms.
Tests are updated to allow the test server to handle requests con
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for JDK-8254996: 'make
> jdk.net.UnixDomainPrincipal a record class'?
>
> `jdk.net.UnixDomainPrincipal` is a simple immutable data class that requires
> boilerplate methods for access. However, these methods and fields are
> susceptible to trivial
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 17:11:28 GMT, Conor Cleary wrote:
>> The KeepAliveStreamCleaner in sun.net.ww.http package had been previously
>> seen to fail with an IllegalMonitorStateException. This failure was caused
>> by the use of `wait()` in a non synchronized block. This failure was
>> mitigated t
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 17:11:28 GMT, Conor Cleary wrote:
>> The KeepAliveStreamCleaner in sun.net.ww.http package had been previously
>> seen to fail with an IllegalMonitorStateException. This failure was caused
>> by the use of `wait()` in a non synchronized block. This failure was
>> mitigated t
13 matches
Mail list logo
