Hi all,
could you please review this small patch?
according to [RFC3659](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3659), time values in
MLSx response have the following format:
>time-val = 14DIGIT [ "." 1*DIGIT ]
>
>The leading, mandatory, fourteen digits are to be interpreted as, in
>order f
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:21:42 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Continuing this review as a PR on github with the comments below
>> incorporated. I expect there will be a few more
>> iterations before integrating.
>> On 06/09/2020 19:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 26/08/2020 15:24, Michael McMahon w
> Continuing this review as a PR on github with the comments below
> incorporated. I expect there will be a few more
> iterations before integrating.
> On 06/09/2020 19:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 26/08/2020 15:24, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>>
>>> As I mentioned the other day, I wasn't able to use
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:59:23 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> forgot to stage updated test files in last commit
>
> test/jdk/java/net/UnixDomainSocketAddress/AddressTest.java lin
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:52:41 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Continuing this review as a PR on github with the comments below
>> incorporated. I expect there will be a few more
>> iterations before integrating.
>> On 06/09/2020 19:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 26/08/2020 15:24, Michael McMahon w
> Continuing this review as a PR on github with the comments below
> incorporated. I expect there will be a few more
> iterations before integrating.
> On 06/09/2020 19:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 26/08/2020 15:24, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>>
>>> As I mentioned the other day, I wasn't able to use
> Continuing this review as a PR on github with the comments below
> incorporated. I expect there will be a few more
> iterations before integrating.
> On 06/09/2020 19:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 26/08/2020 15:24, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>>
>>> As I mentioned the other day, I wasn't able to use
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:36:24 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> final feedback from Alan
>
> test/jdk/java/nio/channels/unixdomain/SocketOptions.java line 59:
>
>> 57: s.b
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:28:13 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Michael McMahon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> final feedback from Alan
>
> test/jdk/java/nio/channels/unixdomain/NonBlockingAccept.java line 61:
>
>> 59:
> Continuing this review as a PR on github with the comments below
> incorporated. I expect there will be a few more
> iterations before integrating.
> On 06/09/2020 19:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 26/08/2020 15:24, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>>
>>> As I mentioned the other day, I wasn't able to use
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 22:13:40 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Continuing this review as a PR on github with the comments below
>> incorporated. I expect there will be a few more
>> iterations before integrating.
>> On 06/09/2020 19:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 26/08/2020 15:24, Michael McMahon w
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my doc-only fix for JDK-8253474: 'Javadoc clean
> up in HttpsExchange, HttpsParameters, and
> HttpsServer' ?
> This fix is set of formatting changes intended to clean up the javadoc of the
> following classes :
>
> `com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpsExchange`
> `
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 22:13:40 GMT, Michael McMahon wrote:
>> Continuing this review as a PR on github with the comments below
>> incorporated. I expect there will be a few more
>> iterations before integrating.
>> On 06/09/2020 19:47, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 26/08/2020 15:24, Michael McMahon w
13 matches
Mail list logo
