Hi Chris,
Is there any progress on this issue?
--
Best Regards,
Sean Chou
Changeset: 4a64eefbfd7a
Author:weijun
Date: 2011-03-25 11:58 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/4a64eefbfd7a
7023056: NPE from sun.security.util.ManifestEntryVerifier.verify during Maven
build
Reviewed-by: mullan
! src/share/classes/java/util/jar/JarVerifier.jav
Changeset: f326a018fd3f
Author:smarks
Date: 2011-03-24 17:26 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/f326a018fd3f
7029680: fix test/sun/misc/Version/Version.java build parsing
Reviewed-by: ohair
! test/sun/misc/Version/Version.java
Changeset: 83260b3305ac
Author:jjg
Date: 2011-03-24 16:14 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/83260b3305ac
6597678: JavaCompiler.getStandardFileManager always uses default charset not
the one that user specifies
Reviewed-by: mcimadamore
! src/share/classes/
Changeset: 632a96f5752d
Author:jjh
Date: 2011-03-24 11:40 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/632a96f5752d
7029823: (ann) test/java/lang/annotation/package-info.java no longer compiles
Summary: Use @Deprecated instead of @java.lang.annotation.Documented
Reviewed-by
Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
You are right, before these changes iphlpapi.dll is not loaded unless
NetworkInterface or ResolverConfigurationImpl are called. After these
changes iphlpapi.dll is loaded once net.dll is loaded.
I think we should use specify the loading of these dll's to be
delayed. I
On 03/24/11 11:49 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Yes, we will now have a dependency on iphlpapi.dll, but this dll is
part of Windows since Windows 2000 and the functions we are using are
all available on XP. Does this address your concern, or do you have
another issue?
The conc
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Yes, we will now have a dependency on iphlpapi.dll, but this dll is
part of Windows since Windows 2000 and the functions we are using are
all available on XP. Does this address your concern, or do you have
another issue?
The concern is that we load yet another DLL at star
On 03/24/11 10:55 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Alan, Michael,
The subject line says it all! Nice to be able to remove this old code
that is no longer necessary. Hopefully this will make maintenance a
little easier going forward.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7030256/webrev
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Alan, Michael,
The subject line says it all! Nice to be able to remove this old code
that is no longer necessary. Hopefully this will make maintenance a
little easier going forward.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7030256/webrev.00/webrev/
Mike Duigou noticed I pushe
Alan, Michael,
The subject line says it all! Nice to be able to remove this old code
that is no longer necessary. Hopefully this will make maintenance a
little easier going forward.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7030256/webrev.00/webrev/
Mike Duigou noticed I pushed this webrev to cr.op
11 matches
Mail list logo
