Re: RFC 3542 or RFC 2292 - Advanced Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for IPv6

2007-11-22 Thread cormac mullally
Hi Michael, I aggree it is quite specialised, but I think it would be good for java to support this. Yes I would love to use Linux or Solaris but I have to support windows. I am going to look at the internals of the openJDK now and see how it works. Thanks for your help so far and I will let you

Re: RFC 3542 or RFC 2292 - Advanced Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for IPv6

2007-11-22 Thread Michael McMahon
Hi Cormac, I don't think it's likely that Java SE will support RFC3542 in the near future. I can't say however, whether anybody is actually doing any work on trying to support it. It seems like a fairly specialised requirement, that the majority of IPv6 applications would not use. Have you l

Re: Fwd: custom DatagramSocket and DatagramPacket

2007-11-22 Thread Roger Abelenda
Hello, I'm continuing a work that was started in 2006. We first improve the already implemented, and now we are gone to view the basics rfcs and implement the rest of the basic stack. I'll see tonight if i can, if we already have implemented thath rfc, but i don't think so. 2007/11/22, cormacmul <

Re: Fwd: custom DatagramSocket and DatagramPacket

2007-11-22 Thread cormacmul
Hello Roger, I just submitted a mail there about RFC 3542 and RFC 2292 Advanced Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for IPv6. Do you implement anything to do with routing headers? I am working in academia as well and would be very insterested in talking about your solution. Are you visib

RFC 3542 or RFC 2292 - Advanced Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for IPv6

2007-11-22 Thread cormac mullally
Hello all, I'm working on a project at the moment that needs's access to the "type 0 routing header" in an IPv6 packet. RFC 2292 describes a nice API, which allows you access to the routing header, see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2292#section-8.9 I see that JavaSE supports RFC 2553 Basic Socket