Hello Roger, I just submitted a mail there about RFC 3542 and RFC 2292 Advanced Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for IPv6. Do you implement anything to do with routing headers?
I am working in academia as well and would be very insterested in talking about your solution. Are you visible in the subscribers list, maybe I could contact you by email? Thanks, Cormac Roger Abelenda wrote: > > I'm in an academic project implementing an ipv6 stack entirely with > java in the jvm, and make the jvm by default call my ipv6 stack. > Thanks for advice, i'll try. > > 2007/10/30, Alan Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Roger Abelenda wrote: >> > Hi I'm implementing an DatagramSocket and a >> > datagramPacket and I want to subsitute the ones of the jvm with this >> > ones. If you know: where may I put my code and what shall I do to make >> > it compile when I compile the jvm?, and , what changes Ii need to do to >> > plug it into the original code to make the jvm call my classes when >> > somebody calls the original ones?. I thought to change the >> > classloader.c and the resolve.c. Any other options? thanks. >> > >> As DatagramSocket and DatagramPacket are created by public constructors >> then you'll need to replace the existing classes. As a first step, for >> testing purposes, it might be easier to prepend your classes to the boot >> class path rather than replacing the classes in the build. Another >> approach is to create a DatagramSocketImpl and use the >> setDatagramSocketImplFactory method to set a factory that instantiates >> your impl rather than the default. Can you provide a few more details on >> what you are trying to do? If you are trying to fix a bug or add a >> feature then maybe it would be easier to contribute changes to the >> existing code rather than replacing them. >> >> -Alan. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Fwd%3A-custom-DatagramSocket-and-DatagramPacket-tf4718553.html#a13896659 Sent from the OpenJDK Networking Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
