Re: ingress SMTP

On 9/3/08 10:50 AM, "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:46 PM, *Hobbit* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> What I'm trying to get a feel for is this: what proportion of edge >> customers have a genuine NEED to send direct SMTP traffic to TCP 25 >> at arbit

Re: ingress SMTP

On 9/3/08 12:48 PM, "Alec Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Winders, Timothy A wrote: > >> We have not setup a port 587 smtp submit server. Our smtp servers run only >> on port 25. > > Sorr

Re: ingress SMTP

On 9/3/08 12:59 PM, "Jason Fesler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I agree, it's not the "right way to do things". Running a mail server used >> to be much easier. Volunteers to help set things up "the right way" are >> always welcome. :-) > > Supporting those clients who can't connect is cheape

Re: ingress SMTP

On 9/3/08 1:04 PM, "Winders, Timothy A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/3/08 12:59 PM, "Jason Fesler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I agree, it's not the "right way to do things". Running a mail server used >>> t

Re: ingress SMTP

On 9/7/08 4:51 PM, "Eugeniu Patrascu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 8, 2008, at 12:31 AM, Michael Thomas wrote: > >> Eugeniu Patrascu wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 3, 2008, at 8:08 PM, Winders, Timothy A wrote: >>> >>>>