On 19/05/2010 13:18, Malte von dem Hagen wrote:
> On May 19, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Robert D. Scott wrote:
>
>> Normally you need to contact the entity you cannot reach, and they will open
>> a ticket backwards through MilNet. This is the only process I have been able
>> to get to work.
>>
> Wel
On 02/07/2010 13:20, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> At the very bottom of each message, you will see
>
> https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
>
> If you go there, you can unsubscribe.
>
> Regards
> Marshall
>
>
Was it really necessary to quote the entirety of the digest when responding?
B
> Hello,
>
> I have no idea what this is referred to as, so I will try
> to explain: I have a client interested in setting up a
> mobile phone text message service where a mobile user
> would send a text to a short (say 5 digit) 'telephone'
> number. I've seen commercials on TV w
> The system "would literally, like an anti-aircraft weapon, shoot down an
> attack before it hits its target," he said. "And that's what we call
> Einstein 3.0."
Oh dear.
I cringe whenever I read such a massacre of correct English like this.
If it's going to "literally" shot down an attack like
Rick,
> - is used to send mail to anyone who reads it on a Windows box
> - is used to send mail to any mail server running on a Windows box
>
> is going to be harvested -- it's only a question of when, and from there,
> it's only a question of when spammers will start trying to deliver
>
>
> Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> Ryan Harden wrote:
>>
>>> While you could probably build a linux router that is just as fast as a
>>> real hardware router, you're always going to run into the moving pieces
>>> part of the equation.
>>>
>>
>> Not if you boot directly from USB key into memory with no
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Looks like they found a new willing partner.
>
> I like how their web page says "Network Uptime: 03:56:55 up 1562 days,
> 17:51 (100%) 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.03, 0.02"
>
> Now, the difference between host and network aside, I find
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, William Hamilton wrote:
> > What's amusing about having one user on that particular host?
>
> That's the _front page of their corporate web site_. It doesn't say
> "host" it says that's their _network_.
>
You a
Jay Ess wrote:
Jorge Amodio wrote:
Another one from the "Evil Doer"
http://www.google.com/advertising/holiday2009/
Wish the guys from Redmond and others copy this action too ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_&_Melinda_Gates_Foundation
Whilst it may have been established by one of t
On 15/01/2010 16:14, William Herrin wrote:
Is it bad English? Is it not clear?
No, it is not clear.
It's perfectly clear.
Can anyone else give better wording
that might result in less of an issue?
"Please reply to this message to reopen your ticket and escalate your
case to a live human
On 15/01/2010 16:57, Michael Thomas wrote:
The difference is that nobody wants to "talk" to a robot when they're
the victim
of a false positive which is causing business impacting interruption. A
robot is not
empowered to go beyond its instructions, and if it's programmed either
wrong or with
in
On 21/01/2010 07:25, Randy Bush wrote:
>> It's funny how we circle around with technology, folks are dumping
>> their phone land lines and adopting wireless/mobile that required a
>> substantial technology leap and investment and now we are using the
>> mobile phone to "text" an incompressible dial
12 matches
Mail list logo
