On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:39 PM John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Owen DeLong via NANOG said:
> >> The cost of putting flyers in the bills rounds to zero, so yes, really.
> I expect these companies all have plans
> >to support v6 eventually, someday, once they're retired and replaced all
> of
Owen,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 23:51 Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 12:34 , Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:39 PM John Levine wrote:
>
>> It appears that Owen DeLong via NANOG said:
>>
>>
> Glad you noted this. Thinking th
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:25 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6092
>
> good stuff. thanks.
>
The memories are all coming back now. I thought this was old news.
regards,
Victor K
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:55 AM Owen DeLong via NANOG
wrote:
> Use SLAAC, allocate prefixes from both providers. If you are using
> multiple routers, set the priority of the preferred router to high in the
> RAs. If you’re using one router, set the preferred prefix as desired in the
> RAs.
>
> O
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:22 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 29, 2021, at 09:25, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:55 AM Owen DeLong via NANOG
> wrote:
>
>> Use SLAAC, allocate prefixes from both providers. If you are using
&
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:51 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 9/29/21 1:09 PM, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:22 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 29, 2021, at 09:25, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 5:49 PM Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 22:11, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>
>> In the consumer world (Where a consumer has no idea who we are, what IP
>> is and the Internet is a wireless thing they attach to).
>>
>&
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:01 PM Valdis Klētnieks
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:09:26 -0400, Victor Kuarsingh said:
>
> > - Both providers provide IPv6 and delegate a prefix to the router (let's
> > pretend the retail staff knew enough to sell this person a consu
We should move on and focus on constructive comments vs. kicking an
operator when they are down.
That said, demeaning comments, no matter what they are or whom they are
targeted at, is not healthy and is not helpful.
regards,
Victor K
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 9:11 PM L F wrote:
>
> Lest we ALL
This is the most they can and will say. For liabilities reasons, specifics
are likely not in the cards. As most services ride over common service
networks, its quite possible that a network substrate failure can have a
number of upstream service impacts. The point here is that the CEO is
directl
Let's see how this goes. A political hearing will (IMO) likely not resolve
in the identification of core technical issues nor meaningful changes to
avoid what was experienced on July 8th. A third party conducting a real
technical investigation is likely the way to find a RCA and set of
recommend
ld not part of the generally reachable part
of the Internet (inbound, all ports, all protocols). The CGN zone within
the ISP network is as much part of the Internet as a home network would be
(non-routable addresses used to service an upstream NAT).
Victor Kuarsingh
>
>
> > The Te
Clinton,
On 10/23/2016 8:12 AM, clinton mielke wrote:
My question for you guys, since Im a theoretician and not a seasoned
operator: how feasible or legal is it to find telnet scanning activity or
any of these passwords in high-bandwidth netflows? If its feasible, then
this at least gets you t
IM,
Some good comments on this thread so far.
Having chosen between OSPF and IS-IS more then once over the past 20 years
for various networks and have chosen differently in some cases. I have a
general preference for IS-IS in very large networks, but OSPF has performed
well for me in larger nert
Jean-Francois,
Comments in line.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024, 22:59 Jean-Francois Mezei
wrote:
> On 2024-08-02 21:39, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
>
> > Following process, redacted portions of the XONA Partners report have
> > been published.
> >
> > https://crtc.gc.ca/otf/eng/2022/8000/c12-202203868.htm
Dmitry et al,
I found Jeff's following comments to be quite insightful for general
practices.
http://www.networkcomputing.com/ipv6-tech-center/231600717
http://www.networkcomputing.com/ipv6-tech-center/231700160
As for using 127s on P2P links
He discussed reasoning behind using /64s, conce
Glen,
One transition scenario you noted below is often a use case. I have seen
networks move from OSPF to IS-IS (more cases then the reverse).
In those cases, the overlap period may not be very short (years vs.
weeks/months).
I have also seen some use one protocol (which I think was mentioned i
now.
I should have highlighted the context before sorry.
Regards,
Victor K
From: Glen Kent
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 00:13:38 +0530
To: Victor Kuarsingh
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: ISIS and OSPF together
Victor,
Folks could, at least theoretically, use ISIS or OSPF
consider IPv6,
changing the WAN side IP is also reasonable (IA_NA). But if you plan on
supplying the home network a prefix delegation (IA_PD), you get into some
problems if you wind up renumbering the home network.
Not sure if this example fits your profile, but at this point, I would not
consid
All,
I was looking for anyone who has operational experience with the SSR
platform used as a SGW and/or PGW function in mobile environment.
Please contact me off-list.
Thanks,
Victor Kuarsingh
e
for any redundant emails you may get (we are just attempting to reach
the widest audience possible).
Philip Matthews
Victor Kuarsingh
I/we (Philip and I) attempted to keep the question as generic as
possible, allowing folks to state the IGPs they use, in whichever
combination or in some cases (as we can see), more complex deployments.
I would agree with statements form Joel earlier with respect to cases
where early vendor
Phil,
Been watching this conversation and had a few comments.
First, one of the concerns is exposure to wire monitoring on the HFC
(Hybrid-Fiber Coax) plant while using DOCSIS, then I think folks should be
aware that there is encryption applied to the traffic between the CMTS and
Cable Modem (CM)
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
> I'm not really an advocate for or against DHCP or RAs. I really just want
> to understand what feature is missing.
>
> From: Blake Dunlap
> Date: Monday, December 30, 2013 3:19 PM
> To: Ryan Harden
> Cc: Lee Howard , Jamie Bowden ,
> "na
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
> >>> The better question is are you using RIP or ICMP to set gateways in
> your
> >>&
Leo,
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
>
> > I'm not really an advocate for or against DHCP or RAs. I really just
> want
> > to understand what feature is missing.
>
> I encourage you to try this simple experiment in your l
Sent from my iPad
On 2011-06-08, at 5:09 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Matt Ryanczak"
>>
>>> Indeed. Verizon LTE is v6 enabled but the user-agent on my phone
>>> denies me an IPv6 experience.
>>
>>
27 matches
Mail list logo
