Do you need to carry the v6 af in the underlay? I’ve used 6pe/6vPE to carry
v6 over v4 next-hops in the overlay without issue, but can’t say I’ve
tested a dual-stack vtep.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 08:07 David Hubbard
wrote:
> Hi all, was curious if anyone is doing dual stack v4/v6 over Arista’s
>
+1 for Packetfence, was just typing up a reply about it. I've used it for
both standard dot1x as well as guest wired/wireless.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:25 AM Neil Hanlon wrote:
> it's a bit more than just freeradius, but PacketFense is no-bs GPL
> software to do this, among much more.
>
> I th
Another handy one to find where it's hiding, since it can be bundled inside
other JARs:
find / -name *.jar | xargs strings -f | grep -i log4j
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:57 AM Doug McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:38:04AM -0800, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
> > > On Dec 11, 2021, at 04
Tangentially related to xR1, have any of you started deploying SN
connectors on your 400G head-ends? It looks like a pretty clever
technology, adding discrete connectors per lane, but curious what the
adoption has been thus far.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 8:55 AM Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG
wrote:
Is there a way to fix the geolocation on a JPNIC netblock being advertised
in the US market short of transferring the ownership of the record to an
ARIN ASN?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Julien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just worked with couple of those in the RIPE list.
> Giving you the name off list
Have you tried submitting a correction to some geolocation services
directly yet? Maxmind is pretty heavily used.
https://support.maxmind.com/correction-faq/submit-a-correction/how-do-i-submit-a-correction-to-geoip-data/
On Thursday, February 9, 2017, David Sotnick wrote:
> Hi NANOG,
>
> You ha
I’ve bought through ipv4marketgroup in the past. Easy to work with, but
you’ll want to do your own scans of the address space to make sure it
hasn’t been burned yet.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 08:43 Stan Ouchakov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone recommend transfer market brokers for ipv4 addresses? Need
I've used IPv4 Market Group before. Process was pretty painless, and they
were trusting enough to allow us to pay by PO (your mileage may vary).
http://ipv4marketgroup.com/
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My US-based employer will be starting a new business unit
Thanks for the transparency, Vincent. Are you able to share how the AS-Path
became mangled to begin with? I’m assuming this was some kind of route
optimizer, but maybe something else going on?
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 07:32 wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I'm working for MilkyWan / AS2027 and I wanted
So not only are they hijacking prefixes, they're leaking the /30s to their
peers. Failure through and through.
On Saturday, April 1, 2017, George William Herbert
wrote:
>
> Hey, Bharti, knock that off.
>
> http://bgpstream.com/event/78126
> http://bgpstream.com/event/78125
> http://bgpstream.co
I've deployed a 7280SR in that role. Needs the FLX model/license, and a
special TCAM optimization command to install all the routes in hardware.
Right now, just pulling a single v4 feed, expanding to a second soon; no v6
yet. Overall, no major issues with it, but Arista seems to be pretty
close-lip
I'd avoid the 7280R for this. Works great as a P router for cheap, fast
label switching, but their VRF implementation is lacking with both
route-leaking and MP-BGP address family (other than standard ipv4+ipv6)
support being nonexistent.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:12 PM, David Hubbard <
dhubb...@di
Thousandeyes works well, but it's also really expensive.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Joe Flowers
wrote:
> LogicMonitor is an excellent all-inclusive SaaS solution:
> https://www.logicmonitor.com/
> ᐧ
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Alan Kemp wrote:
>
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > We have cust
I use the 7280R in production. Love it.
Pros: Cheap, fantastic API, can take (current) full tables of v4 and v6.
6x100G w 48x1/10G gives lots of flexibility.
Cons: Lack of proper VRF support and minimal bgp address families. (If you
want strict isolation, or can use a separate device for route le
Mostly idle at around 102W atm.
On Thursday, May 4, 2017, Ken Chase wrote:
> hows the power footprint? i never understood why each prefix cost
> 1mW to handle on most routers (and still took 2-3 minutes to converge)
>
> /kc
>
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:55:54PM -06
Neighbor x.x.x.x local-as {whateverasn} no-prepend replace-as
On Friday, May 5, 2017, LF OD wrote:
> We have a number of small routers in co-lo sites that peer with B2B
> partners. As more of our partners move to cloud, we are considering a
> consolidation effort and putting all of our peering
We're using a mix as well, some QSFP28 AOC, others DAC. One thing that you
need to keep in mind about the DACs is going to be the bend radius. These
things are girthy af, so make sure to either overestimate your runs
slightly, or buy one to test first.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Hugo Slabbe
Look at TMobile, they provide IPv6 public addressing, and offer relatively
cheap prepaid plans.
On Sunday, September 17, 2017, Max Tulyev wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> sorry for possible off-topic, I really did not know where to ask this.
>
> I'm going to visit USA for two weeks. I want to buy a local pr
Are you advertising out multiple circuits? Check the pathing both
directions if you can. A lot of CDNs enforce uRPF strict.
On Tuesday, November 14, 2017, james machado wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I have a 4 byte ASN and have not had any issues with reach ability,
> including the 2 websites you have link
For Enterprise/DC, it works great. For service provider, they're not 100%
yet. The main issue is going to be around VRFs, as there's no interaction
between them (at least in the code version I'm on, that may have changed
recently or be changing soon). They'll work great as a P-Router, but if you
ne
Yeah, been seeing similar issues in Detroit area.
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017, Van Dyk, Donovan via NANOG
wrote:
> Hello fellow netengs,
>
> Is anyone else experiencing issues with Verizon network in North America?
> We have seen multiple outages throughout the day for traffic destined for
>
I worked alongside a company that used addresses assigned to the Syrian
govt for their "guest" network. They were a pretty large org, presumably
this was done to reduce risk - firewall rules, accidentally leaking guest
prefixes to their internal nets, or just straight-up simplicity. They were
in a
This blog has a pretty good runthrough -
http://fmad.io/blog-100g-ethernet.html
Scroll down to "100G PROTOCOLS".
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some optics are implemented with multiple lasers such as QSFP+ with 4x 10G
> = 40G or QSFP28 with 4x 25G = 100G.
23 matches
Mail list logo