In my experience it all comes down to Cisco-certified people being
easy to find, and managers not wanting to spend all their time in the
hiring process. So yes, I've generally seen Cisco as the de-facto
choice, but it's rarely been a technical argument that swings the
balance. I'm generally playing
I regularly used to lower the ARP timeout to 5 minutes (to match the
mac-address-table aging limit) on devices running on ATM LAN-E segments and
saw no ill effects.
-saxon
On 10 August 2012 08:23, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> Cisco default ARP timeout is 4 hours. Do anyone change that to
> something
On Cisco hardware PPPoE was cleaner if you have other ISPs' customers on
your network and you want to put them in their own VRF's. I've been out of
that world for a while now, so maybe it's changed.
-saxon
2009/10/28 JD
> There is a debate among our engineering staff as to the best means of
> p
3 matches
Mail list logo
