On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
[...]
No, my point is that if you use RFC-4193, there's not really much benefit
from altering the prefix, so, nobody gets penalized and you can still have
static addresses.
[...]
If anyone is aware of any other widely-used applications in home/office
com
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Naslund, Steve wrote:
1. Running open access wireless does not make you legally an ISP and if
OK.
your open wireless is used to commit a crime you could be criminally
negligent if you did not take "reasonable care" in the eyes of the
court.
I believe this is incorrect un
Comments deep below.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> 2. If I provide access to four or five friends, I am not an ISP and in
> fact I am responsible if they use my connection to do something illegal
> since I am the cu
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Naslund, Steve wrote:
[...]
When it comes to running an open access point, I think the legal issue
would be negligence. Is it negligence for the 90 year old grandma to
have an open AP (probably not, just didn't know better)? Is it
negligence for me to have an open AP (pro
4 matches
Mail list logo
