On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Owen DeLong wrote: [...]
No, my point is that if you use RFC-4193, there's not really much benefit from altering the prefix, so, nobody gets penalized and you can still have static addresses.
[...]
If anyone is aware of any other widely-used applications in home/office computing, or apps or devices in mobile telecoms, that use RFC-4193 *by default* I would be very interested to learn about them for a paper I am working on.
-- A. Michael Froomkin, http://www.law.tm Blog: http://www.discourse.net Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law Editor, Jotwell: The Journal of Things We Like (Lots), jotwell.com U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | froom...@law.tm -->It's hot here.<--
