Re: OT: Re: Younger generations preferring social media(esque) interactions.

On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 02:46, Cynthia Revström via NANOG wrote: > > I have used Mattermost but iirc it has very limited access control unless you > have the enterprise version and generally doesn't seem to be made for public > groups. I'm going to chime in here since I admin the DNS-OARC Matter

Re: Reinventing the wheel on a path to deeper learning

On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 02:42, Cynthia Revström via NANOG wrote: > > And while Discord is not at all a replacement for mailing lists in my > opinion, I think it's important to realize that it (and other chat based > things like it) have their place, especially among the younger groups. I'm not e

Re: NXDOMAIN Resolvers

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:00 AM Antonia Affinito < antoniaaffinit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good morning, > I am currently analysing the DNS resolvers (local and public ones) in > terms of protection and performance (in particular their speed). > I noticed that, in case of a malicious domain name, s

Re: AS112 contact

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 08:57, Elmar K. Bins wrote: > Hi guys, > > I hope this is only slightly off-topic... > > I'm looking for the correct address for AS112, 1...@root-servers.org > keeps bouncing whatever I try. > > If anybody can drop me a line...much appreciated. > There is also o...@as112.n

Re: Level(3) DNS Spoofing All Domains

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 10:57, Patrick Schultz wrote: > Just to weigh in: Here in Germany, the largest internet provider (Deutsche > Telekom) did the same thing. > It's basically just a "search guide", it redirects you to a search page > and assumes you just had a typo in the URL. > > Telekom stop

Gmail email blocking is off the rails (again)

For some reason Gmail has started blocking mailman administrative emails to someone who's an admin on a list I host. Their SMTP 552 error message points to , which implies the "problem" is the URLs in the email, but is otherwise completely unhelpf

Re: Gmail email blocking is off the rails (again)

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 16:38, John R. Levine wrote: > > Though I agree that Gmail spam filtering is top grade, or close to be so, > > it still sends to spam a statistically significant number of emails from > > IETF and ICANN mailing lists I'm subscribed to. It depends as well on > > which accoun

Re: Gmail email blocking is off the rails (again)

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 17:39, John R. Levine wrote: > > Or maybe users are tired of the useless monthly messages and report them > as spam. > Again, these are not a user messages or regular list traffic, they're admin/moderator messages addressed to an admin of a list. Your point about the possi

Re: Gmail email blocking is off the rails (again)

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 17:54, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > Again, these are not a user messages or regular list traffic, they're > admin/moderator messages addressed to an admin of a list. > > So, to clarify the OP issues here — you're using Gmail on your domain > (aka G Suite), and are also

Re: Monitoring system recommendation

On 6 June 2016 at 07:18, Manuel Marín wrote: > Dear Nanog community > > We are currently planning to upgrade our monitoring system (Opsview) due to > scalability issues and I was wondering what do you recommend for monitoring > 5000 hosts and 35000 services. We would like to use a monitoring syst

Re: number of characters in a domain?

On 23 July 2016 at 14:31, Ryan Finnesey wrote: > I was hoping someone can help me confirm my research. I am correct that > domains are now limited to 67 characters in length including the extension? > 63 octets per label (the bits between the period separators) , 255 octets per domain name. In

Re: Application or Software to detect or Block unmanaged swicthes

On 7 June 2018 at 04:57, segs wrote: > Hello All, > > Please I have a very interesting scenario that I am on the lookout for a > solution for, We have instances where the network team of my company bypass > controls and processes when adding new switches to the network. > > To put a finer point o

Re: Finally some common sense - No to blocking DNS

On 25 July 2018 at 10:10, Jacques Latour wrote: > This is good news for the internet up here! It's unconstitutional to block > DNS access!!! JF must be happy :) > https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-court- > rejects-quebecs-bid-to-ban-citizens-access-to-private-online-2/ > > Court reje

Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting?

On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 2:12 AM Bryan Fields wrote: > > > Could these be related to the fact that dnsvis.net is trying to reach these > servers via IPv6 and I think they use Hurricane for transit. Since HE and > Cogent is a major gap, this causes them to time out trying to reach the C root > serve

Re: DNSSEC & WIldcards

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:26 AM Dennis Burgess via NANOG wrote: > So have *.app.linktechs.net that I have been trying to get to work, we > have DNSSEC on this, and its failing, but cannot for the life of me > understand why. I think it may have something to do with proving it exists > as a wild

Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers

I'm a few years removed from having direct involvement in our DCs now, so I don't have an example on hand to look at. Is cooling (and in-cabinet temperature) not a part of the SLA? If it is, then there shouldn't be a question of the DC staff brushing off complaints about the temperature–either L3

Re: Google DNS intermittent ServFail for Disney subdomain

On 22 October 2017 at 12:23, David Conrad wrote: > Damian, > > Pragmatically speaking, I strongly suspect the increase in valid queries > to authoritative servers even if all “large recursive resolvers” went away > would be lost in noise of the overcapacity necessary to deal with even a > lower-e

Re: .org dns trouble?

On Mar 13, 2014, at 14:05 , Mike wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry if there's another list for this, but Im observing a strange problem > with a .org domain. Right now when I query dns, I am getting only a SOA for > '.org' which looks like this: Your example query is only checking your local recursive

Re: .org dns trouble?

On Mar 13, 2014, at 15:16 , Mike wrote: > Problem identified. My domain is on hold... ugh, my eyes are tired, thanks to > those who were able to help me (in email). > Also my information hiding was a bit weak, I should have used 'example.org' > to make it clear I was deleting the real info. e

Upcoming DNS-OARC Workshop

Morning all, From all reports the recent DNS BoF at the Miami NANOG was well received. As a follow up, I'd like to the a moment to let everybody know about the upcoming DNS-OARC Workshop March 13th and 14th in San Francisco durning the ICANN 40 meeting. Both days are open to the public but at