Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

I have an employee who has recently switched to Xfinity cable service. Ever since they switched their internet service their work phones will not stay registered for more than about 3 minutes. These same phones have been used on many ISPs without issues. The same config has been used behind m

Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

or my daughter’s home and she got Xfinity. Everything worked for a few minutes then I could not keep phones registered after. Norman Jester On Sep 10, 2024, at 12:18 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: I have an employee who has recently switched to Xfinity cable service. Ever since they switched

Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

2024, at 12:52 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: Well this is curious Same issue... they are breaking something with registration. What region are you in? We are in North Central PA so we're routing On 9/10/24 3:25 PM, Norman Jester wrote: Your message is timely for me. I literally have the

Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

CGNAT, some saying they don't.  If they do, I wonder if their CGNAT routers have SIP ALG enabled or disabled.  Unfortunately, these are the sorts of questions I suspect first level support can't help you with. On Tue, 10 Sep 2024, Matt Hoppes wrote: So not even the same area then.

Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

tried TLS for the SIP transport by chance? I manage a few phones on comcast across the country and have no problems. On 9/10/2024 3:52 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: Well this is curious Same issue... they are breaking something with registration.  What region are you in?  We are in North Central

Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

E doing SIP ALG when acting as a router. On Sep 10, 2024, at 2:17 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: I have an employee who has recently switched to Xfinity cable service. Ever since they switched their internet service their work phones will not stay registered for more than about 3 minutes. These s

Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

End user switched back to the old ISP. We couldn't have work stoppage any more for something as simple as SIP registration. On 9/10/24 5:57 PM, Norman Jester wrote: I did the same…. No progress at all. Norman Jester On Sep 10, 2024, at 1:00 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: So not eve

Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

dwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> ---

Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

roprietary gateway or customers on a CGNAT service with them? I have been a Comcast customer for years, with my own equipment, and have never had issues using Polycom SIP phones on RingCentral. This is getting a little concerning for me as we are planning to roll out SIP phones direct to u

Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinity

Yes. We run lots of SIP UDP over many networks without issue.I feel like bloat is exactly an application for using UDP? With TCP won't that cause more bloat/delay? That being said, we generally see about 3-6 ms between end points and our PBX systems, so I'm not really worried about dela

Frontier

I need a network administrator from Frontier to contact me ASAP regarding BGP advertisement of a block that needs to stop please. We are down. Have been told it will be several days until restoration. And frontier is advertising our ips so I can't even advertise them out a different route. T

Re: Frontier

> At last, threaten them with legal actions by sending angry emails or calls to > senior ops/management/marketing/legal department. > > On May 2, 2017 17:14, "Matt Hoppes" wrote: > I need a network administrator from Frontier to contact me ASAP regarding BGP > adverti

Carrier classification

Are the terms tier-1,2,3 dead terms or still valid ways to define carriers?

Re: Carrier classification

So there are now Carrier Class carriers and Food Grade Carriers? Who in the greater community defines terms like this? > On May 13, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Ca By wrote: > > >> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 8:45 AM Matt Hoppes >> wrote: >> Are the terms tier-1,2,3 dead t

Re: Hurricane Irma: Florida, Puerto Rico and U.S. VI

T-Mobile is providing free calling text and data. > On Sep 11, 2017, at 21:11, Sean Donelan wrote: > > > A couple of additional items > > Telecommunications - Free WiFi hotspots (where power available) > >Comcast Xfinity WiFi >Charter Spectrum WiFi > > I expect other commercial WiFi

Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing

Had a previous employee or I discovered it on the network segment after we had some weird routing issues and had to get that cleaned up. I don't know why anyone would do that when there is tons of private IP space. > On Dec 17, 2017, at 17:30, Robert Webb wrote: > > Will anyone comment on the

Netzero Email Abuse

Could someone from Netzeros email abuse team contact me? Your spam notification system is spamming me and I have been unable to get ahold of anyone regarding this. Over the last 48 hours it has sent probably 25-30 emails to our abuse email address. All emails are the same, with the same conten

Re: Netzero Email Abuse

> This was as of ~5 years ago, things may have changed now, but I doubt it. > > On 2/9/18, 7:21 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Matt Hoppes" > > wrote: > >Could someone from Netzeros email abuse team contact me? > >Your spam notification system is spammi

ProofPoint Contact

Could a proofpoint e-mail blacklist contact please contact me? We are trying to get a blacklist resolved and can't get ahold of anyone.

TEKTONIC CONTACT

Could someone from Tektonic VPS please contact me off list about routing issues?

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

Why do we need this? We already have 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. And any reputable company or ISP should be running their own. What purpose would this serve?

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

Do we? (Need more services like this?) Why not just implement recursive cache severs on end user routers? Why does an end user CPE need to query one or two specific DNS servers? Recursive servers like PowerDNS are extremely simple and light weight. Is there a legitimate reason things don’t j

Re: Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 public DNS broken w/ AT&T CPE

Seeing as how 1.1.1.1 isn’t suppose to be routed I’m not surprised this is causing odd issues. > On Apr 2, 2018, at 11:03, Darin Steffl wrote: > > I am behind a Calix router at home for my ISP and 1.1.1.1 goes to my router > and not any further. When I enter the IP into my browser, it opens th

Re: Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 public DNS broken w/ AT&T CPE

...@mtin.net >> >> www.mtin.net >> www.midwest-ix.com >> >>> On Apr 2, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Matt Hoppes > rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: >>> >>> Seeing as how 1.1.1.1 isn’t suppose to be routed I’m not surprised this >> is causing odd issu

Re: Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 public DNS different as path info for 1.0.0.1 and 1.1.1.1 london

So in all this discussion, what I'm finding interesting is that 8.8.8.8 is actually more hops away from me than either 9.9.9.9 or 1.1.1.1 On 4/2/18 6:06 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 4/2/18 14:58, Marty Strong via NANOG wrote: Routing from ~150 locations, plenty of redundancy. https://www.cloud

Re: Google Apps for ISPs -- Lingering fallout

Which is odd. Considering it was basically gmail on the back end and they still got ad revenue from it. > On Aug 24, 2015, at 08:34, Scott Helms wrote: > > Ryan, > > Most certainly, the charges varied some because of size and other factors > but it was around 25 cents monthly per Gmail box

Re: WiFI on utility poles

Use 2GHz instead of 5GHz for the outdoor WiFi plants? On 9/10/15 9:09 AM, Shane Ronan wrote: And how do you propose we solve this? On Sep 10, 2015 9:06 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: 5 GHz noise levels affecting people whose primary means of Internet access is via fixed wireless . - Mike H

Frontier flaps -12:15?

Did anyone experience any flaps or outage in the Frontier network between 12:15 and 12:30 eastern today? Appeared to be in Ashburn.

Ashburn

What the world is going on in Ashburn? Over the last two days I've seen multiple flaps from multiple carriers going through there. They generally last about two to three minutes and then everything restores.

Re: Ashburn

issue and they were going to do software upgrades to fix. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Matt Hoppes mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>> wrote: What the world is going on in Ashburn? Over the last two days I've seen multiple flaps from multiple carriers going through

Re: Dial Up Solutions

Coretel - outsource your modem pool > On Oct 16, 2015, at 15:28, Will Duquette wrote: > > Does anyone have any suggestions on equipment for our ISP that is still > supporting dial up customers? > > At the moment we are running 3Com Total Control 1000's but are running out > of spare parts as we

Re: new message

Am I the only one getting these messages repeatedly for the last day??? > On Oct 24, 2015, at 21:35, Ricky Beam wrote: > > Hey! > > > > New message, please read > > > > Ricky Beam >

Level3 Customer Center Down?

Has anyone else experienced the Level3 Customer Center down for the past 2 days? All I get when I try to go there is: http://www.level3.com/en/customer-center/ An HTTP error occurred while getting: http://www.level3.com/en/customer-center/ Tried in multiple browsers from multiple ISPs.

Re: failover via comcast tunnel?

You could tunnel to a data center. Or NAT out their service. Tunneling via EoIP would allow you to stay within their ToS. > On Dec 17, 2015, at 16:01, b...@theworld.com wrote: > > > I'm looking at some sort of 50-100mbps failover link in case my > primary is down. > > My options seem limit

Netflix stuffing data on pipe

Has anyone else observed Netflix sessions attempting to come into customer CPE devices at well in excess of the customers throttled plan? I'm not talking error retries on the line. I'm talking like two to three times in excess of what the customers CPE device can handle. I'm observing massive

Re: Netflix stuffing data on pipe

> Adaptive bandwidth detection. > >> On Dec 29, 2015 8:59 PM, "Matt Hoppes" wrote: >> Has anyone else observed Netflix sessions attempting to come into customer >> CPE devices at well in excess of the customers throttled plan? >> >> I'm not talki

Re: Netflix stuffing data on pipe

9 21:17:51 -0600, Josh Reynolds >> wrote: >> >> The second part. Fixed wireless is not even on their radar. >>> On Dec 29, 2015 9:16 PM, "Matt Hoppes" wrote: >>> >>> So they are trying to stuff every last bit as an end device modulates up &

TransPacific Partnership

Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?

Re: TransPacific Partnership

connectivityit > > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes > Sent: Monday, 4 January 2016 10:32 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: TransPacific Partnership > > Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional > monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?

Re: Cogent & Google IPv6

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if Cogent isn't peering with Google IPv6, shouldn't the traffic flow out to one of their peer points where another peer DOES peer with Google IPv6 and get you in? Isn't that how the Internet is suppose to work? On 2/24/16 2:43 PM, Damien Burke wrote: Not sure. I

Level3 routing issues

Is anyone seeing packet loss or routing issues on the Level3 network on the east coast right now?

Re: UDP clamped on service provider links

No. But I've seen Level3 just have really bad packet loss. > On Jul 30, 2015, at 22:12, Jason Baugher wrote: > > To bring this discussion to specifics, we've been fighting an issue where > our customers are experiencing poor audio quality on SIP calls. The only > carrier between our customers

Level3 packet loss

Anyone again seeing level3 packet loss tonight leaving the east coast going west bound? In my case to Dallas.

<    1   2