ots and can respond accordingly.
Layer 3 access networks could conceivably have an issue here, though.
It's almost as if everyone ought to have been working on this a decade
ago so that we'd have a workable solution by now! :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton
ealing with
any more of them than they do now.
Widespread multihoming might be technically pure, but I reckon most customers
would rather eat their firstborns than take up the option.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Netwo
s
better than staying where we are.
(which reminds me: http://www.internode.on.net/news/2011/08/238.php It ain't
that hard)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
t the usual time the next morning, it'll play an IVR
out of your home PBX network to tell the boss you're too hungover to come to
work.
Owen's world has built in automated protection to help you through the fact that
IPv6 subnetting will turn you to drink :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newto
ed to work when you can't predict an end-user's
address?" have no good answer. If any systems folks want a nice meaty problem
domain to focus their efforts on, DNS would be da shiznit.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@int
On 11/08/2011, at 12:41 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2011, at 12:30 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>> Finally a useful post in this thread. Good work on the deployment of real
>> ipv6!
>>
>
> Thanks. And thanks to Vendor-C for helping us through it. The IPv6
ed for trigonometry.
Another useful judgement call when you're flying is to understand that
as long as you know where you are and where you want to be, any forward
progress whatsoever is a positive when there's a growing thunderstorm
behind you :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton
k for every device a customer places on their LAN.
As a service provider, it's better to burn one TCAM slot per customer for the
prefix you route to them, and leave adjacency relationships within their home
to them.
Think of MAC address table size limits on switches. Similar problem.
- mark
ne of the things businesses are supposed to do, right?
Regards,
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
almost none of it will go anywhere at all, if not for
the fact that Belinda Neal's entire political party seems to share her
mastery of of the issue.
ObNOG: Botnets are bad, n'kay?
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engine
work.
http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,26021106-15306,00.html
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
&q
comparison to a lab environment.
Does the CCNA exam still ask questions about RIP and classful
addressing?
Just askin' :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
new...@atdot.dotat.or
ngs?
I think by the time we've put carrier NATs everywhere the users will
notice that all by themselves, and we won't need to tell them anything.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
tween those and the equivalent v6 ALGs will be the
lack of v6 NAT.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-
re is if you have a dual-stack device, your L4-and-above protocols
are the same under v4 and v6, and you don't want to reinvent the ALG
wheel.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
ations are not being performed.
On a commodity consumer CPE device, the ALG code doubles as a
stateful inspection engine.
So it _is_ required when address translations are not being performed.
Is security something that gets thought about now, or post-deployment?
- mark
--
M
So who's going to have standing to drag them into court over false
declarations
to ARIN? Will ARIN be suing their members? Not likely.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
new...@a
very well either :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark N
Set needs to be updated, which is probably an even worse
proposition :-)
I'm strongly in favour of ASPLAIN. I reckon the people who advocate
using dots because they think 32-bit ASNs up to 4 billion are too long
to remember are probably getting old :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton
est router vendor and being
confronted with actual independently-developed working code for their
hardware platforms, have the least excuse out of any of them. Years
and years of talk, and no customer-visible action whatsoever. What
an exceptionally ordinary performance.
See you in Melbo
On 03/12/2009, at 12:53 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Would you consider Juniper SSG5 as a Consumer Grade router?
Depends. Can I get one at Frys for $69.95 and set it up with
a web browser?
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engin
products do 6to4 out of the box, but don't support v6 natively.
Apple seems to have ideological objections to DHCPv6, so at the moment
there's little hope at all that prefix delegation will work on any of their
CPE products.
- mark
--
Mark Newton
rd kernel panics if you turn on the
net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv sysctl and start a PPPoE session which
negotiates IP6CP.
(I have a bug open with them, and I'm confident that it'll be fixed...
but c'mon...!)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...
On 03/12/2009, at 22:46, "TJ" wrote:
From: Mark Newton [mailto:new...@internode.com.au]
On 03/12/2009, at 9:51 AM, Dave Temkin wrote:
You're correct, out of the box there aren't many. The first
couple that
come to mind are the Apple Airport Express and Airport Ext
the firewall what should be accepted.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
rybody the effort.
>
> Not if the victim doesn't have rights on the firewall (e.g. enterprise).
Would you be using "Consumer Grade - IPV6 Enabled Router Firewalls" in the
enterprise? 'cos if you would, I think I might have entered the wrong
thread :)
- ma
esn't include `lack of market demand' as a
reason for not doing it.")
Argh. Disillusionment, much?
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
on rules controlled by the SHIM6 protocol layers
on the hosts... but we weren't allowed to call them NAT gateways,
because IPv6 isn't supposed to have any NAT in it :)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer
nd that if the vendors
ever do actually manage to get around to shipping something it'll
be so poorly thought out that it's impractical to use in a service
provider environment until version 2 -- which, in the case of CGN,
will be too late.
- mark
--
Mark Newton
if I tell them they'll have to spend a hundred bucks to restore
the functionality I broke for them last week I'll have a revolt
on my hands...)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer
x27;s not like we're talking about creating UPnP from whole cloth. We're
discussing a replacement of like-for-like, updating existing capabilities
to support IPv6.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer
ving towards IPv6 dual stack on your
> networks.
... and, unstated behind that, is the observation that pretty much any
proposed effort to squeeze more time out of IPv4 will inevitably have
the same answer :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com
ds the cost
of recovering space.
There's sure to be an upper-bound on the cost of v4 space, limited by the
magnitude of effort required to do whatever you want to do without v4.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (
On 06/03/2010, at 1:06 AM, David Conrad wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
>> On 05/03/2010, at 2:50 PM, David Conrad wrote:
>>> When the IPv4 free pool is exhausted, I have a sneaking suspicion you'll
>>> quickly find that
ten
subscribers onto each NATted IPv4 addresses, then I only need 50,000
addresses to service them. Yet I have half a million addresses
*right now*, which I won't be giving back to my RIR. So that turns
into 450,000 saleable addresses for premium customers after the
SP-NAT box is turned on,
he same problem with the same array of
available solutions with the same mixtures of cost, benefit and
care-factor. Odds are that they'll probably make many of the
same decisions.
Sorry, perhaps I'm missing something here, but is there a general
expectation that the v4-v6 transition
smaller?
There's currently social pressure against deaggregation, but given time
why do you think the same drivers that lead to v4 deaggregation won't also
lead to v6 deaggregation?
(small multihomers means more discontiguous blocks of PI space too, right?
eployment will stop dead.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
rms, and that we'll all see significant pressure from
our CFOs and CTOs to get rid of it well before the ten-year estimate expires.
... and if we don't, our customers will.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer
know the difference.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
On 04/02/2011, at 3:43 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Mark Newton
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 04/02/2011, at 2:13 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>>
>>> An armed FBI special agent shows up at your facility and tells your
>>&g
th IPv6.
That's new, and (to my mind) threatening. We've not even begun to
consider the attack vectors that'll open up.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: new...@atdot.dotat.o
On 19/05/2011, at 8:00 PM, Rodolfo (kix) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> what is the status of the reverse DNS in IPv6?
Rhymes with "muster duck."
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: new...@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer
43 matches
Mail list logo
