Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

On Fri, 1 Jul 2016, Mike Jones wrote: > Hi, > > I am in contact with a couple of network operators trying to prod them > to deploy IPv6, I figured that 10 minutes to send a couple of emails > was worth the effort to make them "see a customer demand" (now none of > them can use the excuse that nob

Re: Fwd: [ PRIVACY Forum ] Critical bug threatens to bite mobile phones and networks

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > Heap overflow bug in either a widely used ASN.1 library from Objective > Systems, > apparently popular with cell-radio industry people. Not sure if this will > leak over into NANOG land -- but neither are you, and that's most of my point. > > DO *y

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, jim deleskie wrote: > They were hosting him for free, and like insurance, I can assure you if you > are consistently using a service, and not covering the costs of that > service you won't be a client for long. This is the basis for AUP/client > contracts and have been going

Re: Voice channels (FTTH, DOCSIS, VoLTE)

On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: > Would DOCSIS be the same as FTTH, with the cableco voice service riding > isnide the same DOCSIS bandwidth but with pre-allocated bandwidth, or do > they allocate separate NTSC channels with a totally separate data pipe ? DOCSIS has a possibility

Re: Netalyzr Android: call for volunteers

On Sun, 5 Oct 2014, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote: If you're interested, you can download and run the app from Google Play [1]. [1] https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=edu.berkeley.icsi.netalyzr.android&hl=en For those few who use Android (Cyanogenmod) and opt out of using Google s

Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission...

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, joel jaeggli wrote: > I don't see this in my home market, but I do see it in someone else's... > I kind of expect this for port 25 but... > > J@mb-aye:~$telnet 147.28.0.81 587 > Trying 147.28.0.81... > Connected to nagasaki.bogus.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 nagasak

Re: On Cisco gear, is it possible to retrieve communities associated with a recieved BGP route via SNMP?

On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Jesse McGraw wrote: > I'm looking through their MIB browser and I don't see anything about > communities nor anything that sounds likely under bgp4PathAttrEntry > > Can anyone point me in the right direction? Doesn't seem to be there. Can you check if they end up as strings

Re: Whois.net down?

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:59:02PM +0700, David S. wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > > > I'm able to access https://whois.net, have you check the nameserver of > > numachi.com? > > Is the other domain use same authoritative DNS? > > I can access the web page.

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Todd K Grand wrote: > The problem has been resolved. > Thanks to everybody that contributed. And the issue was...? ~Marcin

Re: Synful Knock questions...

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Jake Mertel wrote: > Reading through the article @ > https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2015/09/synful_knock_-_acis.html, > I'm lead to believe that the process(s) they overwrite are selected to > cause no impact to the device. Relevant excerpt: > > ### > Malware Ex

Re: Microsoft blocking mail

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Tei wrote: > On 18 September 2015 at 04:48, Keith Medcalf wrote: > > > > Being blocked is probably a good thing ... > > > CGI forms that do the validation in the serverside are not up to > modern expectations*. You want to do validation clientside. If you do client-side a

Re: cisco.com unavailable

On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Murat Kaipov wrote: > Hi folks! > Is cisco.com unavailable or it is affected just for > Rostelecom? http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/cisco.com > It's just you. http://cisco.com is up. ~Marcin

Re: The spam is real

On Sun, 25 Oct 2015, Josh Luthman wrote: > Can we please get a filter for messages with the subject "Fw: new message" > ??? I have this in my $HOME/.procmailrc: :0: * ^List-ID:.*nanog.nanog.org> * ^Subject: Fw: new message nanog-junk 355 pieces since I put this rule (only two or so missed). Ma

Re: *tap tap* is this thing on?

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Josh Luthman wrote: > > It's mailman - I believe there's a moderation switch to stop all messages > > dead in their tracks for approval. I've used it before, but don't remember > > the exact name of the feature in the mailman admin UI. http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/admin/

Re: Does no one monitor the list on weekends?

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Jim Mercer wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 09:59:40PM -0400, Robert Webb wrote: > > This spam is ridiculous! > > it should be noted that it has been flowing all weekend, and nobody really > complained or even commented on it until this morning. > > so, yeah, maybe the list

Re: Gmail spam filtering

On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: > On 11/22/2015 12:36 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > > I've just added an SPF for the domain. > > While you are at it, consider adding DKIM too. > > You might as well publish DMARC records if you have SPF and DKIM. I do only DKIM and no SPF for m

Re: OT: ID/RFC formatting

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > I know we have to have a few people on here who've written technical RFCs > (as opposed to 1 April ones like my RFC 2100)... > > Any tips on 1) how to do inline boldface and 2) what to do with ASCIIart > illustrations that are too wide for the page?

Re: Southwest Airlines captive portal

On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > On 27 February 2016 at 10:26, Frank Bulk wrote: > > Anyone from Southwest Airlines on this list? > > > > On a recent flight I discovered I couldn't complete payment through PayPal > > because my web browsers properly noticed that the Southwest

Re: Multiple vendors' IPv6 issues

On Tue, 26 May 2015, David Sotnick wrote: > Arista EOS code — and it only appears to affect Virtual Machines which are > behind our RedHat Enterprise Virtualization cluster. None of the hundreds > of VMware-connected hosts are affected. The symptom is basically the same > as the Palo Alto bug. Nei

Re: Fkiws with destination port 0 and TCP SYN flag set

On Wed, 17 Jun 2015, Maqbool Hashim wrote: > It is always the same destination servers and in normal operations > these source and destination hosts do have a bunch of legitimate flows > between them. I was leaning towards it being a reporting artifact, > but it's interesting that there are a who

Re: Hotels/Airports with IPv6

On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Ca By wrote: > On Thursday, July 9, 2015, Mel Beckman wrote: > > > I working on a large airport WiFi deployment right now. IPv6 is "allowed > > for in the future" but not configured in the short term. With less than > > 10,000 ephemeral users, we don't expect users to demand

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, James Downs wrote: > > > On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai wrote: > > > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain. > > Nad Cog? datacenterops.org is still available *hint*hint* ~Marcin