networks such as docsis conserving edge resources can
be helped with multicast.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2017, at 4:12 AM, Baldur Norddahl
mailto:baldur.nordd...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Den 21. nov. 2017 00.42 skrev "Luke Guillory"
mailto:lguill...@reservetele.com>>:
Why
icient than allowing
multicast across WAN links.
K. Scott Helms
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
[cid:image231e71.JPG@0b2ab948.43bc9114] <http://www.rtconline.com>
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:985.536.0300
Email: lguill...@reservetele.com
Web:
: kscott.he...@gmail.com [mailto:kscott.he...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of K.
Scott Helms
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 8:59 AM
To: Luke Guillory
Cc: Baldur Norddahl; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Broadcast television in an IP world
Luke,
I think I understand your example but the local broadcaster won&#
puting Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
[cid:image3d0842.JPG@83e42971.43a5f684] <http://www.rtconline.com>
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:985.536.0300
Email: lguill...@reserve
y, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. Yogi Berra
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
[cid:imagea31855.JPG@9f5ca8aa.498ff694] <http://www.rtconline.com>
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:985.536.0300
Email: lguill...@re
ks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2AFA805732A1394E | Public PGP
Key ]
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
[cid:imaged86681.JPG@423db806.4c87add4] <http://www.rtconline.com>
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:985.536.0300
Email: lguill...@reservetele.com
Web
Notice that the LOA is only checked off on /24 or larger.
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:985.536.0300
Email: lguill...@reservetele.com
Reserve Telecommunications
100 RTC Dr
Reserve, LA 70084
The presentation I saw listed the two, 5448 and ACX+ as different products.
5448 listed as Committed while the ACX+ was listed as Under Planning. They were
also shown to be targeted at different markets, 1G/10G with 100G and
10G/25G/100G.
ns
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [ma
ACX+
5448 seems to be the 48 port 1g/10g with 4x100g
Presentation I'm talking about is a 69 pager from the 2017 Global Tech Summit.
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:985.536.0300
Email: lguill...@reservetele.com
Re
There is also https://github.com/robcowart/elastiflow which uses the ELK stack.
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innovation
Tel:985.536.1212
Fax:985.536.0300
Email: lguill...@reservetele.com
Reserve Telecommunications
100 RTC Dr
Reserve, LA 70084
He's asking because if it was dark the interface would go down when the link
was lost and the router would pull routes. But PA to FL would lead me to
believe it'll be a wave from some type of DWDM gear which brings us to BFD.
Luke Guillory
Vice President – Technology and Innov
Concurrent is one of them, we use Qwilt but that will get expensive really
quick with their licensing.
https://www.concurrent.com/laguna-cache/
Luke
ns
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 8:41
Juniper ACX 5048 is what we use though you need to license 10g ports
(ACX5K-L-1X10GE) and VPN (ACX5K-L-IPVPN)
QFX does MPLS but I'm pretty sure it doesn't do VPLs.
ns
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Brandon Martin
Sent: Wednesday, Apri
data is
transferred per endpoint for potential metering.
I already use a smaller sandvine at another location and we are satisfied
with it but this would be a bigger project so I am looking for alternatives.
Does anyone have any experience with hardware like this they could
recommend?
Thanks,
:Luke
doubt it, just wanted to be clear).
Feel free to ping me on or off list about either if you have more specific
questions.
-Luke
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Brandon Ross wrote:
> Like so many things IPv6, many of the wifi vendors seem to lack decent
> support for IPv6 clients.
Anyone have contact information for Mediastream/Vyve Broadband NOC?
Luke Parrish | Network Operations Engineer I | Suddenlink Communications |
866.232.5455
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may
Anyone out there seeing issues with Belkin routers connecting?
I have also noticed that Belkins website has 80 percent packet loss and their
support number is busy.
Luke Parrish | Network Operations Engineer I | Suddenlink Communications |
866.232.5455
The
Switch to Nemo.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of J. Tozo
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 3:26 PM
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: Carrier-grade DDoS Attack mitigation appliance
We also evaluating another appliance to put in place of Arbor, their "suppor
Ricky Beam wrote (on Apr 06):
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:20:26 -0400, shake righa wrote:
> >Can one subnet to include /127 for point to point connections?
>
> That's the equiv of a /31 in IPv4. Do you use /31's for p-t-p links
> in your IPv4 network(s)?
>
> (Yes, I've used /31's before, but only
assume this will be the standard definition for a number of
years to come.
Thanks.
--
:Luke Marrott
puter doesn't have power.
:Luke
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Walter Keen wrote:
> I agree, while the majority of government and service providers have
> the opinion that POTS is a lifeline service, and ethernet is not, I
> disagree. I know the service provider I work for is
Looks to me like the target has moved, anyone else seeing similar?
Jan 23 20:19:08 LND02 named[9611]: client 63.217.28.226#39489: view
external: query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
Jan 23 20:19:09 LND02 named[9611]: client 63.217.28.226#20558: view
external: query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
Jan 23 20:19:
that almost all PON technology is proprietary, locking you
into a specific hardware vendor. However I think this is changing or has
already changed, opening PON up for interoperability. Can anyone confirm
this?
Thanks in advance.
:Luke Marrott
e yet?
Thanks!
:Luke Marrott
We have a 10GigE connection with XO in Utah and have gotten little to no
response from XO on our IPv6 requests for months.
We finally got our L3 IPv6, but they don't have a complete routing table.
:Luke Marrott
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Mon, May
On 03/24/2014 06:18 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
DHCPv6 is no less robust in my experience than DHCPv4.
ARP and ND have mostly equivalent issues.
This depends a lot on what you mean by 'robust'
Now, I have dealt with NAT, and I see IPv6 as a technology with the
potential to make my life less unple
On 03/26/2014 03:49 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:55:03AM -0700, Luke S. Crawford wrote:
There are many ways to skin this cat; stateless autoconfig looks
like it mostly works, but privacy extensions seem to be the default
in many places; outgoing IPv6 from those random
On 03/26/2014 11:14 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Why not just use private VLAN layer 2 controls for the privacy you describe?
The technology I know of is what cisco calls 'protected ports' - My
understanding is that those simply mean you can't pass traffic to or
from other 'protected ports' - I
It might make sense to just give everyone their own vlan and their own /64;
that would, of course, bring its own problems and complexities (namely that
I've gotta have the capability to deal with more customers than I can have
native vlans - not impossible to get around, but significant ad
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:41:18PM -0400, Joe Maimon wrote:
> So we have a wiki list of 1U rack hosting.
We do? where? all I see on http://nanog.cluepon.net is spam
> How about a list of SP's willing to configure BGP over whatever you got,
> including tunnels? And willing to allocate you spa
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:31:47PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> You agree on a price per distance (e.g.: mile/foot/whatnot).
>
> Lets say the cable costs $25k to install for the distance of 5000 feet.
>
> That cable has 144 strands.
>
> You need access to one strand. If you install it yourself,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:42:36PM -0500, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I've been many times where you were, frustrated that I didn't know the dark
> fiber options for a potential opportunity, but you have to remind yourself
> don't have a *right* to know where *private* fiber is. It's not just the
> physic
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 06:16:30PM -0400, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> Sometimes making the AS path as short as possible makes a lot of sense
> (e.g. when trying to get an anycast network to do the right thing),
> but assumptions that peering results in lower costs are less true
> every day.
I keep
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 07:25:24PM -0400, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> Generally the costs of transit are pushed down by competition. As a
> vendor your costs for bandwidth/transport/port*bw may drop but you are
> unlikely to drop your prices to your customers merely because your
> costs have gone
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:52:51AM -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> Consider that the probability 16GB of SDRAM experiences at least one
> single bit error at sea level,
> in a given 6 hour period exceeds 66% = 1 - (1 - 1.3e-12 * 6)^(16 *
> 2^30 * 8).In any given 24 hour period, the probability of
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 01:32:17PM -0400, ad...@thecpaneladmin.com wrote:
> Anyone have any tips for getting IPs from ARIN? For an end-user
> allocation they are requesting that we provide customer names for
> existing allocations, which is information that will take a while to
> obtain. They ar
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:59:47AM -0400, Brandt, Ralph wrote:
> One of the first things cellular companies can do is stop overselling
> cellular. The second is end or raise the price significantly on
> unlimited plans, both voice and data. Go to what the landlines called,
> USS, that is you pay
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:50:47AM -0400, not common wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for some guidance on full packet inspection at the ISP level.
>
> Is there any regulations that prohibit or provide guidance on this?
Unless you are absolutely huge, and maybe even then, you need to worry
more
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:06:03AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> We pay what our providers think they can get away with. Like most pricing
> decisions, they're not based on any "technical logic", they're based on what
> the market will bear. Feel free to turn the process around -- decide what
>
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:34:22PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 09:39:16PM -0400, Luke S. Crawford wrote:
> > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:06:03AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > ... Feel free to turn the process around -- decide what
> > >
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 07:43:42PM -0700, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
> Why haven't we taken this out of the hands of website operators yet?
> Why can't I use my ssh-agent to sign in to a website just like I do
> for about hundred servers, workstations, and my PCs at home?
>
> One local password used
like david below, we've been getting reports this morning from customers
unable to reach various web sites.
investigating a number of these reports, the one commonality is level3
in chicago. sites are reachable from level3/cincinnati but not
level3/chicago.
traceroutes make it one hop past o
On 11/19/2014 07:29 PM, David Hubbard wrote:
Appears to have been resolved after seven hours. My ticket just says:
"We isolated the routing issue and resolved it.
The issue was due to a misconfiguration on one our core routers."
Now that the issue is corrected, interestingly enough, my trace
fyi:
On 11/20/2014 02:42 AM, cool hand luke wrote:
On 11/19/2014 07:29 PM, David Hubbard wrote:
Appears to have been resolved after seven hours. My ticket just says:
"We isolated the routing issue and resolved it.
The issue was due to a misconfiguration on one our core routers."
I also have had good experience with (used) servertech/century/power
tower (I think all the same brand) - very inexpensive; if you are in
santa clara I have some spare 2u 16 port 208v (20a/c19) units.
Here is something a buddy wrote up when we were wiring them to the
user-accessable power o
On 08/29/2013 07:43 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
+10 Good explanation.
This is a lot of why I have someone like Cogent/L3/etc and some random
transit provider in most of my pops I spec, plus a backhaul to another node.
...
One thing to keep in mind is that for major Tier 1s, it's not at all
uncom
Joe Abley writes:
> What is everybody's favourite combination rack-mount VGA/USB KVM-over-
> IP and serial console concentrator in 2009?
>
> I'm looking for something that will accommodate 8 or so 9600bps serial
> devices and about 12 VGA/USB devices, all reachable over IP via sane
> means (ssh,
ask me. (I imagine
the guys who have to deal with cooling feel differently, but at my
scale, that's all priced into the power.)
--
Luke S. Crawford
http://prgmr.com/xen/ - Hosting for the technically adept
We don't assume you are stupid.
rs source IP
upstream? I know the problem is difficult due to trust issues,
but if I could null route the source, it's just a matter of detecting abusive
traffic, and with this attack, that part was pretty easy.
--
Luke S. Crawford
http://prgmr.com/xen/ - Hosting for the technically adept
http://nostarch.com/xen.htm - We don't assume you are stupid.
Roland Dobbins writes:
> On Aug 8, 2009, at 11:57 AM, Luke S Crawford wrote:
>
> > 2. is there a standard way to push a null-route on the attackers
> > source IP upstream?
>
> Sure - if you apply loose-check uRPF (and/or strict-check, when you
> can do so) on Cisco
goe...@anime.net writes:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2009, Luke S Crawford wrote:
> > 1. are there people who apply pressure to ISPs to get them to shut down
> > botnets, like maps did for spam?
>
> sadly no.
...
Why do you think this might be? Fear of (extralegal) retaliation by
bo
Richard A Steenbergen writes:
>
> You've never seen a single port go bad on a switch? I can't even count
> the number of times I've seen that happen. Not that I'm not suggesting
> the OP wasn't the victim of a human error like unplugging the wrong port
> and they just lied to him, that happens
Randy Bush writes:
> be specific, like "if you run X tools the payoff will be Y."
Yes. And where is the appropriate form for this?I find this
sort of thing quite interesting; and yeah, it doesn't seem like the
sort of thing NANOG is for, but most of the small ISP forms
(like webhostingtalk
Randy Bush writes:
> > speaking as a small provider, I can tell you that I find running snort
> > against my inbound traffic does reduce the cost of running an abuse desk.
> > I do catch offenders before I get abuse@ complaints, sometimes.
>
> unfortunately snort does not really scale to a large
"Brandon Galbraith" writes:
> But it's definitely not cool when my credit card company cuts off my card
> due to "abnormal charges" when I'm abroad and suddenly can't get ahold of
> customer service via their international phone number. Automation in the
> right places works wonders for both conve
bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com writes:
> or - the more modern approach is to let the node (w/ proper authorization)
> do a secure dynamic update of the revserse map - so the forward and reverse
> delegations match. ... a -VERY- useful technique.
I have a question. Is this an abuse problem? som
"Christopher Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, how do you know you can trust the VPN folks anymore than the
> cable-modem folks though? eventually the same cost issues are going to
> arise for the VPN folks as did for cable-modem/dsl folks (downward
> pressure on pricing and infra/opex/cape
Peter Beckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you are taking card-not-present credit card transactions over the
...snip "hard to charge fradulent customers" and also "verifying customer
identity annoys the customer"... points-
The goal here is to give abuse a negative expected return.
One w
Peter Beckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...snip "use snort" suggestion
> This is what I think we should ALL be doing -- monitoring our own network
> to make sure we aren't the source, via customers, of the spam or DOS
> attacks. All outbound email from your own network should be scann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Apart from using Bernstein's tinydns, anyone have any scripts
> for looking for problems in zone files or for incrementing the
> serial number reliably?
If you are using BIND, your problem is solved by DDNS and nsupdate.
this has the added advantage of making it signi
Greetings,
Anyone with the FAA around by chance, needing to speak to someone regarding a
circuit we provide to a specific VOR-DME. We normally deal with L3Harris though
that avenue has gone unanswered.
Appreciate any help anyone can provide.
Luke
The state PSC would be my vote, they reach out asap on complaints from what
I’ve seen locally here in LA.
From: NANOG on behalf of
Mike Hammett
Date: Thursday, December 12, 2024 at 9:58 AM
To: John Neiberger
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Need Centurylink contact for serious ongoing issue
*E
101 - 162 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
