On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 06:16:30PM -0400, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: > Sometimes making the AS path as short as possible makes a lot of sense > (e.g. when trying to get an anycast network to do the right thing), > but assumptions that peering results in lower costs are less true > every day.
I keep reading people say that. But wouldn't the same forces that push down the per-megabit cost of transit also push down the per-megabit cost of peering?
