RE: Netflix Is Eating Up More Of North America's Bandwidth Than Any Other Company

> From: Rick Astley [mailto:jna...@gmail.com] > I think most the points made here are valid about why it isn't an easy > problem to solve with multicast. > Lets say for instance they had a multicast stream that sent the most > popular > content (which to Randy's point may not cover much) and 48 ho

RE: Had an idea - looking for a math buff to tell me if it's possible with today's technology.

fferent definition of "work" than I do. If it can't > finish before the universe ends I don't think it works. :) You obviously do not read enough SciFi. By then (whenever then is) sub picoseconds optical quantum computers will be

RE: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space

ith overlapping 1918 space in previous networks, so they thought "Oh, we'll nick this space, it's DoD and nobody will ever use it..." and it's all fine, until somebody uses it. It's just a really lazy way of getting things done that is likely to come and bite you sooner

RE: UN declares Internet access a "human right"

> worried. I figure it warrants a discussion. > IPv4 or IPv6 ? -- Leigh Porter __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __

RE: Why don't ISPs peer with everyone?

they will already see my routes via their HE peering" So then they get some transit from a network who is useless with their settlement free peering, then get the peers on the X-exchange and only when they are happily peered will they go to HE. -- Leigh Porter __

RE: skype

I love how this story was published AFTER MSFT purchased them ;-) -- Leigh Porter > -Original Message- > From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:t...@americafree.tv] > Sent: 07 June 2011 15:28 > To: Randy Bush > Cc: NANOG Operators' Group > Subject: Re: skype > >

RE: skype

ack in mid December. Indeed, but "reverse engineered" and "Egyptian government snooping Skype calls" are quite different. Whilst some people may have rather foolishly relied on Skype for privacy, this is now not going to happen. I doubt it'll

RE: Hotmail?

broke once, but since the LDAP front ends were behind Alteons nobody ever noticed it. The whole thing cost less than the licenses for most commercial systems we looked at. -- Leigh Porter __ This email has been scanned by the Me

<    1   2   3