As a relative 'outsider' I see a lot of finger-pointing and phrasing this
as (effectively) someone else's fault.
To me this is a failing on a number of levels all contributing to the
problem.
1) The manufacturer - Backdoors, hidden accounts, remote access
capabilities, no proper security testing.
And I contend that the device manufacturer is only one part in this.
Yes, the manufacturers need to get better in securing their devices (that's
never been in question).
*But* the end users need to have better CPE that can do NetFlow/Sflow/etc
in a near real-time fashion. This would allow the end
Honestly, I'm surprised they don't try and charge a 'convenience fee' while
implementing the block! ;-)
Ken
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ethan E. Dee wrote:
> So their policy says, if an ISP has one scalper, we'll block their entire
> subnet and not tell them why?
>
>
>
> On 02/06/2017 11:4
This list?
https://support.content.office.net/en-us/static/O365IPAddresses.xml
>From the linked-above page (it's somewhat obscured).
Ken
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:14 AM ML wrote:
> In the past I've pulled down an XML file that included the IP space for
> all of the O365 products. Then I fi
Would be remiss in our duties if we didn't also link AWS' blog, in response
to the Bloomberg article.
In short, AWS refutes many of Bloomberg's reporting in the article.
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/setting-the-record-straight-on-bloomberg-businessweeks-erroneous-article/
Ken
On Thu, O
I know most of the day yesterday my Centurylink DSL (Denver, CO) I was
having odd... issues, but only to some sites, and intermittent. I'd
have issues getting content from a URL (but pinging the host would be fine,
and manual telnet to TCP/443 would work). Latencies were *slightly* higher
than
Yeah, not sure that was related, as my issues started earlier in the day
(about 8am-9am Mountain time).
Either way it all seems fine today, no hiccups, no issues. so whatever it
was got resolved.
Ken
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Pennington, Scott <
scott.penning...@cinbell.com> wrote:
> Th
7 at 11:39 AM, Ken Matlock
> wrote:
>
>> I know most of the day yesterday my Centurylink DSL (Denver, CO) I was
>> having odd... issues, but only to some sites, and intermittent. I'd
>> have issues getting content from a URL (but pinging the host would be
>>
Yep, I've been in this industry since.. '94 or so, and the absolute number
one reason that I do not participate in NANOG is that even going back as
far as I can remember it's been a good-old-boy's club.
Yes, there are some very smart people that speak up, but I see time and
time again the cliques
Right, BFD on a dark fiber link (should) be immediately detected and the
detecting end should send a cease/stop/whatever message to the remote peer
to drop the neighbor relationship.
BFD really comes into it's own in a derived circuit (such as metro-E or
other type setup) where you can have an ind
Ha! I'd say that's an upgrade for the BCN! ;-)
I still have nightmares about Site Mangler, and conflicting versions
between it and the BCN/BLNs.
Ken
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Justin M. Streiner <
strei...@cluebyfour.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Jim Devane wrote:
>
> They make
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:09 PM, ryanL wrote:
> there's a reason why cisco introduced "service unsupported-transceiver",
> which still remains an undocumented command. i have arista gear as well.
> kinda wish they had a similar undocumented command.
>
Arista does have it (at least in older code
Origin NAT? ;)
Ken
> On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:15 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:21:32 -0600, David Edelman said:
>> How about Origin Obfuscation
>
> Obfuscation implies intent. Most leaks and mis-announcements don't
> have intent because they're whoopsies.
Wait, you mean to say that the normal mode for TNT's was it *not* to reboot
and crash all the time? :)
Ascend tech support's stock answer to any issue was either
1) Upgrade the code
2) Oh, you already tried that? downgrade the code! :)
And the company that managed to put out a release to 'fix a
14 matches
Mail list logo
